1027
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by livligkinkajou@slrpnk.net to c/nolawns@slrpnk.net

Bill was introduced in Sep/25, but I only got a whiff of it in the last couple of weeks

See House Bill HB1878: https://fastdemocracy.com/bill-search/pa/2025-2026/bills/PAB00038963/

Are there any other states/countries taking similar initiatives?

Summary:

Pennsylvania homeowners deserve the right to choose native plant species they desire for landscaping around their homes. However, work is needed to remove bottlenecks for homeowners to select native vegetation for their desired landscaping.

This legislation will prevent homeowners associations (HOAs) from unreasonably prohibiting the use of native plants for landscaping on private property. This ensures homeowners residing within an HOA the same ability to choose native landscaping as other homeowners.

Native plants provide many beneficial functions that many homeowners desire. These include being aesthetically pleasing and providing habitat for pollinators while being adapted to the site and typically requiring lower maintenance than non-native plants. [...]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

What's the point of even having a yard if it looks like the ones in the picture? Why not just go live in an apartment then. To me, owning a piece of land to enjoy was kind of the key reason I wanted to own a house in the first place.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 13 points 4 days ago

What’s the point of even having a yard if it looks like the ones in the picture?

Dog bathroom.

Where I live, it's a bathroom for other people's dogs.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Wait are you referring to the flat green lawns or the native / overgrown one?

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Yeah native plants does not mean you have to keep your lawn an overgrown jungle.

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 17 points 4 days ago

If it's your yard you should be allowed to have an overgrown jungle if you so wish.

[-] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I agree, if only you are controlling invasives, and promoting native plants. Emphesis on controlling invasives.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago

Most grasses that people intentionally plant and cultivate are invasive.

[-] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

Just like what ICE are doing you mean?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Your land has effects on you're neighbors' land.

Anyone who has had a big tree stretching across the property line can tell you this.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

What you say is true, but I have absolutely no idea which direction you are trying to go with that comment.

[-] myrrh@ttrpg.network 4 points 4 days ago

...do you see where you're posting?..thriving verdant habitats are kind of the entire point of a no-lawns community, and while you're free to rail against natural growth within groomed enviroments it's kind of an old-man-yells-at-cloud exercise in futility...

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

I'm guessing they're referring to the empty lawns that are clearly just there for show.

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
1027 points (100.0% liked)

No Lawns

3909 readers
6 users here now

What is No Lawns?

A community devoted to alternatives to monoculture lawns, with an emphasis on native plants and conservation. Rain gardens, xeriscaping, strolling gardens, native plants, and much more! (from official Reddit r/NoLawns)

Have questions or don't know where to begin?

Where can you find the official No Lawns socials?

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS