127
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 13 hours ago

To be honest, this is probably justified. My knee-jerk reaction was "oh look, USA in antagonizing everyone else again", but consumer routers are a really significant security junction which historically has always been somewhat neglected. I only read a few sentences before the paywall stopped me, but sounds like they'll whitelist any foreign manufacturers that are legitimate.

Yes, it's gonna have corruption and bribes all over it.. But on paper, it's justified.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 11 points 8 hours ago

The vulnerability is coming from inside the house

[-] B0rax@feddit.org 14 points 12 hours ago

What? Because companies from other countries are evil? What makes you think that companies in your own country are better?

Why does the country even matter?

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 12 points 9 hours ago

It's just another routine fascist strategy:

"All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state."

"When goods don't cross borders, soldiers will"

[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 hours ago

I'm not from the US. And I think the way they're trying to tackle it is stupid, roughly for the reasons you say. But on a surface level it's good that there is some action taken on this matter.

The country does matter. It allows oversight and regulation to a greater extent. And if it turns out that there's a backdoor in a router, if it's made locally there will be someone to criminally charge, whereas if it's made in China or wherever, that would be impossible.

Then again, it's the US, so they'd probably charge some random worker instead of the CEO who demanded the back door be implemented.

[-] B0rax@feddit.org 6 points 9 hours ago

What kind of oversight are you talking about? Locally produced items do not need to fulfill more regulations.

If this was about cyber security there would be a mandatory certification (like there is for emc, like the FCC). But blanket statements like „foreign company bad!“ don’t do anything for increasing cyber security

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 6 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, items are licensed according to where they’re sold, not made. “More oversight” makes no sense.

[-] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 19 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I hope things like hardware made by/for openwrt remain available, but it sounds like they will cease to be?

My first thought was the risk of the us demanding us manufacturers include a backdoor

It sounds like the exemption for foreign companies is an option while they create plans for american manufacturing

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I hope things like hardware made by/for openwrt remain available, but it sounds like they will cease to be?

It seems like professional equipment will not be affected:

While the FCC’s Covered List makes it sound like the US is banning all “routers produced in a foreign country,” it’s defined a bit more narrowly than that. It’s specifically banning “consumer-grade routers” as defined in NIST Internal Report 8425A, which refers to ones “intended for residential use and can be installed by the customer.”

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 19 points 12 hours ago

That's not reassuring. It sounds like they don't want home users to be able to get any router they could manage themselves.

[-] StealthLizardDrop@piefed.social 6 points 11 hours ago

nail ~~on~~ in the head

[-] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

I'm not sure their like bananapi based router would be considered professional. More home tinkerer

I'm not sure what that'll mean for the impact of this change, but I guess we'll see 🤷🏻‍♂️

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

but consumer routers are a really significant security junction which historically has always been somewhat neglected.

You're right, but simply shifting the production from overseas to US doesn't inherently make the routers more secure. The article mentions the lack of software updates for discontinued products as a big threat that has been exploited in the past.

I only read a few sentences before the paywall stopped me,

Fortunately, there is no paywall for me. Here is the article on archive.org.

but sounds like they'll whitelist any foreign manufacturers that are legitimate.

No, the article mentions only one exception:

Now, router makers need to A) secure a “conditional approval” that lets them keep getting new products cleared for US entry while they work to convince the government that they’ll open up manufacturing in the US, or B) make the decision to skip selling future products in the US, like dronemaker DJI already did.

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
127 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42542 readers
426 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS