1011
Truthpaste (lemmy.world)

I've never seen labeling like this before. Interesting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 151 points 2 months ago

Can we start doing this with everything?

[-] username_1@programming.dev 72 points 2 months ago

When I was a kid, in my country all machinery and electronics were accompanied with full mechanical and electrical schematics.

[-] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 months ago

A lot of times it's because those things required maintenance, and it was possible to do with basic tools.

Most things these days aren't built with maintenance in mind, mostly because they're obsolete before they need to be fixed.

There are certainly things that doesn't apply to, but for a lot of consumer products, it is.

[-] FippleStone@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago
[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

Also if a CPU breaks in any way, you can't fix it. Best to throw it away and get a new one.

Good thing is they basically never break, anyways.

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

good luck getting the electrical scheme of a current CPU

not because they're secret, but because they're pointless. you wouldn't understand anything from such a schematic. it's way too complicated, and has to be broken down with lots of extra annotations to be comprehensible.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

The problem is a lot of nasty things come from less scary sounding things. For example:

Ingredient: Ricin, Where it comes from: Castor beans, What it's used for: Poison.

[-] Fatal@piefed.social 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There's historical truth to this. In toothpaste, no less.

Ingredient: Asbestos

Comes from: naturally occurring mineral

Used for: mild abrasive

[-] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

To be fair here though, how much toothpaste do you dry and snort these days?

[-] shynoise@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

I assume there's a better example to make your point because at least here you're explicitly stating ricin is used for poison, an objectively good thing to know.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

My point being that knowledge of where something comes from doesn't tell you if it's a good thing or a bad thing.

I could have rephrased "what it's used for" to be "laxative". A true statement which doesn't expose the fact that ricin is a pretty powerful poison.

People are biased to think "chemical name bad, common name good" and that's the problem I'm exposing. You can pull out a lot of toxic stuff from things that sound harmless.

[-] protist@retrofed.com 10 points 2 months ago

The calculus here isn't strictly whether it's "healthy" or not. There are quite a few ingredients that can be derived from both plants and petroleum, for example, and I would choose the one derived from plants every time

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago

This is still an improvement, let's leave it at that.

[-] turdas@suppo.fi 10 points 2 months ago

Ingredient: Hydroxyl acid Where it comes from: Deep underground well What it's used for: Industrial solvent

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I wish. That would be rad.

[-] Dicska@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Inb4 food corporations go: Water - water - extra weight for cheap

this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
1011 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26674 readers
325 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS