141

I worked as a software engineer.
AI is supposed to replace programmers, or at least help you write code.

But I never really wrote a lot of code in the first place??
I looked up libraries that do what I need and then wrote a bit of code in-between to link our API or GUI to the right functions of the selected library.

And these libraries were tested, functional and most of all consistent and reliable.

Now what do you want me to do? Ask an non-deterministic LLM to implement the code from scratch every time I need it in my project?
That doesn't makes sense at all.

That's like building a car and every day you ask somebody else to make you a new wheel. And every wheel will be slightly different than the previous. So your car will drive like shit.

Instead, why not just ask a reputable wheel manufacturer to make you 4 wheels? You know they will work. And in the case of programming, people are literally giving away good, reliable wheels for free! (free libraries and APIs)

Why use LLMs at all?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mniot@programming.dev 37 points 1 day ago

Now what do you want me to do? Ask an non-deterministic LLM to implement the code from scratch every time I need it in my project?

I have some coworkers who are excited about exactly this and I don't get it at all.

[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

For some small things, code from scratch by the LLM is really nice.

For example, I've had the LLMs generate one page HTML dashboards to show data from Postgres over REST. They look nicer than what I could produce. They use vanilla JS with no libraries to maintain, and they handle all of the fiddly UI crap you need to do filtering and formatting.

But for larger, more important projects, I can see that being more of a downside. For instance, code from scratch is going to have vulnerabilities, but no one is out there scanning your code for those vulnerable and reporting them, like they are for libraries.

And also, code from scratch is so much more to maintain. The tech debt will be insane.

[-] Mniot@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago

Your example sounds fine to me, but I wonder if maybe the real value of AI coding that you're seeing is not "AI writes code" but rather "AI ignores all the coding rules/conventions, which were being badly applied in this case."

Like, I could picture trying to write a simple tool as you describe and running into the wall of "We're an Angular shop so you need to use the framework." But the AI isn't forced to follow these rules, so it can do a decent job.

This has been the main value of AI to me. It's just like, "sorry, the machine won't let me do a refund," as an alternative to listening a customer scream that they deserve a refund.

[-] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 7 points 1 day ago

Imagine if we could completely do away with standardization! Think of the security implications!

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
141 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6462 readers
525 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS