532
submitted 3 days ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://ibbit.at/post/205768

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

America is one continent.

ITT: Lots of angry Americans on copium. Stay strong.

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Seems like you enjoyed US education. North America and South America are 2 continenta. They are sometimes referred to as The Americas when talking about them. Same as how europe and asia is called eurasia. Oh and "central america" is a part of north america.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 84 points 3 days ago

North and South America are considered separate continents. They're not even connected now that the Panama canal was dug.

[-] Klear@quokk.au 25 points 3 days ago

Continents are a social construct.

[-] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 25 points 2 days ago

Continents are a geological construct, with continents tending to be granitic, and oceanic plates typically being basalt. Dividing continents with geopolitical boundaries is a social construct.

[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Still it’s perhaps just a human-imposed classification scheme. What about Europe and Asia? Also, India? The boundaries themselves are quite symbolic of how we choose to see the world, even politically. We conceptually compartmentalize continuous systems using all kinds of sneaky criteria. If you’re strictly referring to geological objects, are you still even referring to continents?

[-] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

At the end of the day everything about how we engage with, understand, and define the universe is based off human systems because that’s just how we do. We’re intelligent enough to recognize beyond ourselves and deduce the nature of why things happen and then use our words to describe it. A granitic continent doesn’t know its granite and a basaltic oceanic plate doesn’t know it’s basalt, it operates as it’s properties demand, like they have for billions of years before humans and will for millions of years after we’re gone.

The products of these natural cycles do lend to how humanity has organized itself for thousands of years. River valleys helped establish agriculture and the birth of “civilization”, and mountain ranges, deserts, great rivers, and oceans made for natural boundaries once populations grew to the size they started defining “them and us”.

So I do agree that continents (and natural features in general) shape how we think of the people who live there, and some places have thousands of years of history where those features were the boundaries of their nation. But the physical structure we call a continent exists with or without humans calling it a continent, nations do not. Continents influence human affairs and cultural/national identity at home and abroad, but again, that’s heaping our humanness on what is otherwise a slab of granite that is doing its thing.

I’d point out too, Earth’s plates are constantly shifting, but for the entire existence of humans they’ve only moved a few to a few dozen kilometers. Their importance to our social organizing is partly due to their seemingly static nature. But in 200-300 million years we’ll possibly be all jammed back together Pangea-style. Though I highly doubt humans will be around to see that.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

True but in this society we recognize 7. To recognize only one America with consistency you're probably looking at 4 though maybe a 5th could be argued

[-] Klear@quokk.au 12 points 2 days ago

What do you mean "this society"? Different countries have different standards, and they're all arbitrary.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

I was literally taught two different models in school and those are far from the only ones.

[-] hateisreality@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Probably still connected via plate tectonics.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The Panama Canal doesn't even go all the way down to sea level; it definitely does not make a difference.

[-] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago

Damn I didn't realize we dug into them tectonic plates.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 days ago

They are separate tectonic plates, the two continents only crashed together relatively recently, the "columbian exchange" that saw wildlife mix between the continents. South America was near Africa at one point, North America more with Europe as I understand it.

I find it really cool that the Appalachian mountains used to be connected with what's now the Scottish Highlands, if memory serves correctly.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

When I was on the Appalachian trail they had a placard that explained it and said it's also the oldest mountain range in the world, and used to be like 4x the size of the himalayans (which is the youngest.) Others have disputed that, but just internet randos with no sources, I trust the NPS placard.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I trust the NPS placard.

If it was placed before 2025, sure.

Nowadays, though, they're being systematically torn out and replaced with MAGA christofascist propaganda. Think "war of northern aggression" and destruction of anything about black history, for example.

I wouldn't put it past them to replace info about plate tectonics with creationist bullshit eventually.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

It was a long time ago, and I trust that nps placard. The ones in the cities are not so reliable. I saw one in Independence square in philly that blamed the quakers of all people for slavery (they were against it from the start,) and otherwise projected blame, credit for the placard was like, avenging our ancestors or some shit. The south rose again and took us from the inside, except they did it by an unholy alliance with big business and religion, and it will destroy us all, and our republic.

So crazy to think about because they're so worn down at this point. Neat!

[-] Zombie@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago

Hills near me (northern Scotland) were once magma chambers underneath volcanoes! That's how worn down they are. Wild to think about, and makes some lovely granite.

[-] Jack@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
  1. Scotia plate (bits of Patagonia),
  2. South American plate,
  3. Altiplano plate,
  4. North Andes plate,
  5. Panama plate,
  6. Caribbean plate,
  7. North America plate,
  8. Pacific plate (Baja California peninsula, southern California).
[-] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

(That's the joke)

[-] hesh@quokk.au 5 points 3 days ago

They're also not on the same tectonic plate

[-] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

(That's the joke)

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We did! The canal is tens of meters deep, while bedrock is typically not more than a few meters below the surface anywhere on earth (except where cover naturally collects in places like valleys).

[-] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Where exactly did you get this info from?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

If America is one continent, then Afro-Eurasia is also one continent.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Are we opening the how many continents are there can of worms? Because it makes me incontinent.

I say 9. India is its own continent(al plate so it totally counts) and I like Oceanía being a continent

[-] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Most earthworms are not native to the Americas.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

well how long they been invasive for? when do we define native because horses went extinct and then came back. are they native or not because they fit the environment damn well.

[-] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, earthworms are a significant threat to the boreal forests of Canada. So, I think we can still consider them an invasive species for the continent overall.

[-] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You can use Google by yourself. You don't need me to educate you.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

If I wanted to use the Google I would have asked the Google. I thought we was talking

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Here's that copium you ordered.

A map of the world showing the continents

[-] Humanius@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

This entirely depends on where in the world you are from.

The English-speaking world generally refers to America as two continents.
The Spanish-speaking world generally refers to America as one continent.

Neither are correct, both are correct.

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago

Third grade was a tricky year for all of us

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Depends on which third grade. Some countries learn about America as one continent in e.g. a six-continent model. Which I think is silly given the obvious first continental divide to go would be the Eurasian one that only exists for historical reasons.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

Which I think is silly given the obvious first continental divide to go would be the Eurasian one that only exists for historical reasons.

America makes sense for historical reasons as well. After all it is a massive settlers colony of different European nations. The Spanish influence very much connects both continents, if you want to do that.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

This is the correct model. America developed very similarly, unlike parts of Eurasia which is why Europe and Asia are definitely culturally distinct, but America isn‘t. At least not for a lot of us.

Sorry „north“ Americans, but you‘re not that different from Argentinians to us.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Developed very similarly? On what time scale? Inuit, Salish, Cherokee, Aztec, Inca, and Rapa Nui are all pretty distinct. Post-colonialism there's lots of differences between French, English, Spanish, and Portugese influence. And topographically the North Andes are a pretty solid border (though in many ways it makes more sense to extend out to the coast).

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
532 points (100.0% liked)

World News

54908 readers
2126 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS