599

Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

For example, “make this html grid sortable and add a download button that creates a csv file.” You know exactly what this does, it’s self contained, and it’s something you know can just be copied from stack overflow and applied to your code.

Even if this works, you'll be stealing someone else's code without authorship attribution for anything that's a non-trivial algorithm.

[-] zarniwoop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Let me introduce you to Stackoverflow...or well, what it used to be.

[-] Auth@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Most devs are already doing that. This just saves them the time of doing it for themselves.

[-] Jako302@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago

The copyright/license issues that come with it due to the current unregulated nature of ai are a completely different issue to the vibecode slop allegations.

no. it's one aspect of many. Using slop is ethically wrong AND it produces shitty code with zero innovation and creating technical debt.

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
599 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6310 readers
1208 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS