787
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
787 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
83753 readers
2320 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What you brought up is an appeal to maintain the current iniquitous status quo, by suggesting that the real problem with men being the aggressors in the vast majority of sexual assaults isn't the sexual assaults, but that some men might be falsely accused. But hey, if women want to protect themselves from that, we should legalise excluding them and reducing their service options in other areas, because you know, that's what equality looks like...
The thing is, you don't give a shit about the real world manifestation of inequality. What you want is a platonic ideal of equality, which doesn't exist in the real world, and using it as the measure, just ensures that real world inequality stays around and never gets challenged, because people like you can point to the rules and say "We already have equality" .
don't tell me what I want. you lost all credibility by doing that. I have stopped caring about your words as a result.
equality, new rule (clearly not pushing status quo...) shuld be usable by everyone, not a select few.
stop pushing for inequality then gas lighting and assuming you know what someone desires
You did that part when you said that trying to change the status quo is inequality...
That's very rich coming from a powertripping admin.
You instance banned me without giving any justification. Shove your sense of real world inequality right next to the stick you've got up your a-hole.
You're no different than a neckbeard reddit mod.
The reason will be in the modlog
But generally, it's spam, transphobia and other bigotry that gets you banned.
And I asked you to point out exactly which post or comment of mine warranted the ban. You didn't bother replying.
Powertripping as usual.
You have a 7 hour old account. You'll have to excuse me if I have no idea who you are
I know who you are though. Almighty arbiter of morality and bigotry.
And I'm pissed because you banned me from whole instance for something I had said on a completely different instance. I guess your fucking feelings got hurt and you decided to be a c..t.
Bigotry and spam doesn't become ok based on where you say it
It wasn't bigotry but you decided it was. How the fuck you're not getting it? How thick is your skull?
Yeah, I'm sure I was imagining it. You don't seem like someone to throw around insults and misogyny
And misogyny? I thought that was a favourite word of you people down under.
Yeah I'm a toxic asshole, especially when I'm slighted against.
But you don't even have that much self-awareness. Whatever you deem wrong must be so, right?