647

James Talarico won the Democratic nomination for a US Senate seat in Texas on Tuesday, capping a remarkable rise from state lawmaker and seminary student to the party’s standard-bearer in one of the key races of the 2026 midterm cycle.

With his blend of faith-based populism, bipartisan appeal and generational energy, Talarico defeated Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, a firebrand beloved by the party’s base but who struggled to dispel concerns that she could defeat a Republican in a state that has not elected a Democrat statewide in more than 30 years.

A jubilant Talarico told supporters in Austin before the race was called: “We are not just trying to win an election. We are trying to fundamentally change our politics. And it’s working.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 175 points 4 days ago

I love Jasmine Crockett but infuriatingly, a white man that talks frequently about his Christian faith is much more likely to win a senate seat in Texas.

[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 109 points 4 days ago

I also like Crockett, but to be fair I haven't seen much about Talerico I don't like beyond his Christianity. To be fair in that regard he at least talks the talk of a genuine Christian, rather than the hate mongering bigotry you normally see.

[-] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 62 points 4 days ago

And also of separation of church and state.

[-] baronvonj@piefed.social 53 points 4 days ago

His faith-based takedown of the bill to put up donated ten commandments posters in classrooms was pretty great.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago

Remember that Crockett took a $25k paid trip to Israel by an AIPAC affiliate. Also Talarico's messaging blows hers out of the water with independents and moderate Republicans, and yet still manages to put him closer to AOC in attacking billionaires.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah the AIPAC Israel trip is a big fail

[-] SupahRevs@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Agreed. If Crockett had more leftist ideals and political substance, she'd be a member of the squad. That is not what she is tho. I hope she stays fighting as a Rep and is supportive of initiatives coming from the left wing of the party.

[-] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

This is one of the things that gives me the most hope for him as a candidate. He is (imo) a great public example of how to a person of faith in politics. I think setting this example will have a large impact on US politics as a whole. I think there are a ton of Christians that would break with Trump in a heartbeat given the choice between a Talarico and a Christian nationalist (as unfortunate as that scenario is).

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Tbf he's Presbyterian, the same church as Mr Rogers, and by this atheist's view, the only genuinely honest Christian sect as a whole. They focus heavily on Christ's teaching on community, believe in the charitable service of others as the devine will of god, and they don't prostilitize or require tithes. That's not to say bad people can't be apart of any faith, but as he's a minister of that church (like Mr Rogers) I'm inclined to think he's honest about those core beliefs and not just riding the good name of the church like other politicians have.

Ultimately none of that really matters. He's on record more progressive than Crockett, and unlike her, did not take AIPAC money. That should be a deal breaker for any voter I don't care what party, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion.

https://www.trackaipac.com/states/texas

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 days ago

Presbyterians, ELCA Lutherans, and United Methodists coalition together. Just FWIW. They have different theologies but very similar approaches to what ultimately matters out in the world: ethics

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago

the only genuinely honest Christian sect as a whole.

Are you not counting unitarians? Because hands down they're the best denomination. Only ones I see consistently waving rainbow flags and free Palestine banners.

[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Unitarian is not Christian. There are a lot of disaffected Christians at your local Unitarian church, but they welcome all religions as well as atheists.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

what makes you say they're not christian? they believe in god and they follow the teachings of christ. calling them not christian feels very "evangelicals say ethiopian orthodox isn't real christianity" to me.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Most Quakers seem chill, but maybe I’m overlooking some shitty views they may hold?

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago

Yeah, they're pretty good too, but don't really see that many of there churches these days.

Also your username is dumb and unoriginal. You aren't fooling anyone Rick.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Get off my lawn, kid

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Idk I have to respect the Quakers, even if the only Quakers to be president were remarkably awful (Hoover and Nixon)

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 33 points 4 days ago

A white man who in 2026 has the political sense to say “Gaza is a genocide and that’s a simple moral question,” while Crockett took AIPAC money and voted to continue funding Israel.

[-] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 31 points 4 days ago

I like her and it's clear her messaging is orchestrated to appeal to those of us who hate maga and the rapist in chief BUT she's an ardent AIPAC shill. Fuck every single AIPAC backed candidate regardless of party. Fuck them all.

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This right here.

👏TRACK👏AIPAC👏.COM

[-] Fermion@mander.xyz 30 points 4 days ago

This map convinces me of that. Even amongst the people voting in a dem primary, the rural people preferred the white church boy. Crockett is more qualified, but Talarico has a better chance of actually winning.

Fortunately, they were both good candidates.

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Brother. Do you know how rural all that purple is?? That's the East Texas Piney woods, just as rural as any prairie farmer

[-] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

East Texas is also significantly more African American, even in the small towns

[-] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

What you see on this map is the Hispanic population overwhelmingly supporting Talarico over Crockett, and vice versa for the black population. This bodes well for a general election, given Texas is 40% Hispanic.

[-] SupahRevs@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Looks like San Antonio has churros and Talarico voters.

[-] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 days ago

My problem with Crockett was that she took corporate PAC money. Talerico ran on not taking corporate PAC money.

I don't think Talerico is nearly progressive enough, with the main issue I found being that he supports a public option over universal healthcare, which will ultimately leave insurance corporations in charge. I do hope that, if elected, he could be convinced to pivot further left and that he will continue to not take corporate money, but at this point, I'll believe it when I see it.

[-] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 20 points 4 days ago

I love his gimmick! Being openly Christian and stuff, but not being an intolerant, genocidal brained, warmonger!

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 days ago

He seems to have threaded the needle of studying the bible and not becoming an atheist or a rabid right winger. His belief does appear to be a major factor in trying to help the people who need help. You know, like Jesus said you should.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

For real dude knows how to work a Texas crowd

[-] voxthefox 21 points 4 days ago

Same, me and my wife were split on this vote, but I'd be fine voting for either one, I just wish they were running for different seats. Hope Crockett sticks around to oust Cruz in 2031, but I imagine she finds another race before then.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 7 points 4 days ago

So far as I can tell, Crockett was practically an idpol/Woke-v1 psyop by conservatives. I never thought I'd be happy to see a black woman lose in Texas, or cheer for GenericChristianWhiteBoy#12, but here we are...

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago

conservatives/or "on the fence" are likely to choose a white man, christian over women any day, if they have to somehow vote for D, they would never do it for the likes harris, and clinton because they are women.

[-] chahn.chris@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago

And in the long run, as much as this also sucks, the presidency.

[-] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Call me a dumb fuck, but where can I find this info prior to voting day?

Edit: not this info but the info below this

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
647 points (100.0% liked)

News

36419 readers
1871 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS