829

submitted 4 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] anton 114 points 4 months ago

Everybody wants science to cure cancer, but the moment someone does foundational research they lose their fuckin minds.
Guys, the alternative is cutting up mice and pigs.

[-] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

Yeah, this is pretty far below the level of a mouse even, typically

[-] kureta@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

Iam not sspecifically talking about this example and I am not trying to imply this tissue has any sort of consciousness but if "foundational research" means "man made horrors beyond my comprehension" maybe we need to find another way, and if we cannot, maybe we just shouldn't torture conscious beings in the name of science and progress.

[-] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 34 points 4 months ago

Nature is full of horrors beyond your comprehension. If you want to make that less so, manmade horrors are the only way to do it.
This is by no means torture, quite the opposite in fact. Neurons are little prediction machines, and if you don't give them stimuli, they either make their own of degrade. Particularly in small clumps of cells like this, you can't be sure of whether they're conscious, but if they are, they're having an amazing time learning about the light signals.
That touches upon the actual issue here. We dont know if they're conscious. We don't have a solid idea of what consciousness is, where it comes from, what it consists of, or where the line is drawn. That's the sort of knowledge you only get by performing these sorts of experiments.

[-] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

All I want science to cure is billionaires, we'll take it from there. Concentrations of wealth that enable making brains grow eyes are a bug, not feature. Ever read "Whitey's on the Moon"?

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 months ago

That problem is very much one that's beyond the domain of scientists. That's like saying "All I want literature to do is decipher the genetic basis of cancer". Trust me, if science were able to cure billionaires, it would.

[-] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago

Science gave us the guillotine, I choose to hold out hope. Pinpointing and publishing where all the wealth's being concentrated would be an excellent Science Task

[-] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Science didn't give us the guillotine, no matter which scientific method or forbear you're using to determine scientific nature. At best, engineering gave us the guillotine, but I rather doubt there was any actual engineering design going on when they first made the Halifax Gibbet, except insofar as "I need a simpler and more consistent way to lazily kill petty criminals" was "defining a need".

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026

829 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

20648 readers

1342 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Meta Post Tags

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.