345

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/29640

President Donald Trump pledged Thursday that the United States would provide $10 billion in funding for his so-called Board of Peace—without specifying where the money would come from or how it would be used.

"Totally illegal," US Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) wrote in response to Trump's remarks at the inaugural meeting of the president's board, where attendees—from far-right Argentine President Javier Milei to FIFA president Gianni Infantino—were given MAGA-style red hats.

Trump said during the gathering that "the United States is going to make a contribution of $10 billion to the Board of Peace."

"We've had great support for that number," the president said, without saying from whom. "And that number is a very small number when you look at that compared to the cost of war. That's two weeks of fighting. It's a very small number. Sounds like a lot, but it's a very small number, so we're committed to $10 billion."

Trump also said that member nations of the board have pledged $7 billion total for the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, which Israel has obliterated with the help of US weaponry. (The United Nations has estimated that Gaza reconstruction would cost more than $70 billion over the course of several decades.)

Watch Trump's remarks:

Trump's vow to provide $10 billion in US funds for a board he created and leads intensified concerns that the entire project is another grift by a president who has been described as the most corrupt leader in US history, openly using the power of his office to enrich himself and his family.

"Can’t help but notice that this insane attempted theft is the same sum he’s trying to steal from the Treasury, disguised as damages for the disclosure of his tax records," wrote journalist Brian Beutler, referring to the $10 billion lawsuit Trump filed last month against the US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service.

"Probably a coincidence, which is worse, because it implies double stealing," Beutler added.

Nancy Okail, president and CEO of the Center for International Policy, warned in an op-ed for The Hill on Wednesday that the Board of Peace is part of the Trump administration's "the monetization and privatization of foreign policy for personal enrichment."

"Initially presented as a mechanism to oversee a Gaza-Israel peace process, it has been widely chided as just another unserious Trump vanity project," Okail noted.

David Corn of Mother Jones wrote earlier this month that Trump is "essentially cooking up a global slush fund over which he will exert complete control."

"Countries that get in early—while he’s president—will certainly be in a strong position to request preferential treatment in state affairs. The opportunities for graft and grift are immense. He will probably ask Congress to kick in the $1 billion pay-to-play membership fee to guarantee he’ll have a pot of money to spend (or pocket) at his fancy."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

"Initially presented as a mechanism to oversee a Gaza-Israel peace process, it has been widely chided as just another unserious Trump vanity project," Okail noted.

Oh, it's definitely both. Trump's ultimate Gaza "peace" plan has always been to raze it and build a golf resort there, with other people's money. Golf Courses are very peaceful....

[-] thehowlingnorth@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

MFer posted a shitty AI video of it last year, but it got list in all the other crazy shit.

[-] prole 3 points 1 day ago

Honestly, if they actually do that shit, I hope it gets attacked every fucking day. I hope it costs them so much to defend it from "terrorism" that they're forced to shut it down and leave.

[-] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Is that Trump's plan, or Kushner's?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They are the same plan, they only differ in that Trump wants his name on the resort, while Kushner doesn't care as long as he gets to grift it too.

[-] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

In the case of Kushner it's not just grift, he's an orthodox jew, and a zionist.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Is there a difference between someone who mainly hates Palestinians, vs. someone who hates all non-whites without distinction?

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
345 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28473 readers
2051 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS