view the rest of the comments
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
There is no such thing as a good fed. Remember that. They are bad, or they quit.
Treat them accordingly.
The agent quit because they refused to be a bad person.
Thats the exact point he was making, he literally said that
The point is there was a good agent there before that one quit. Therefore, they weren’t all bad.
Or theyre forced out. No "good" cop can last, hence why they are all bad
And so we can assume in 2026 and onward that if an agent is working, they are bad.
Nah, I know someone that works in the FBI who is one of my favorite people. She's probably the most stand-up, dependable person I know. There are plenty of people like her, who genuinely want to make the world safer, and are just as horrified with everything that's going on. The person I know hunts down serial killers and shit. Her position is less likely to be politicized, but I know that if it was, she wouldn't compromise her morals.
Basically, it's silly to demonize them as a whole. They're not like street cops who are largely trained to be attack dogs. The more good people we have in the FBI, the better. Those that follow unlawful orders though, deserve to be thrown in prison with the rest of the fascists.
Major "i know a good cop" vibes
Fed
The feds haven't had the systemic problem of local police with the "thin blue line" shit.
Until this year, the feds were generally pretty trustworthy.
And now they aren’t. We need to act accordingly.
Sure, that's punchy, but misses the point.
The feds haven't had decades to force out anyone who would do the right thing. There are still plenty of good feds (and now, also, many bad ones).
Outside of ICE, painting with this broad brush isn't helpful.
It’s not missing the point. The point is we should fear the government and assume the worst. Ask questions later.
We're gonna need some of the government to help protect and defend the Constitution of the United State of America.
Not everyone is against the Constitution.
My dude, i know a few dozen feds. They had the same problems, they just had better PR.
What you say is something that many people say, and certainly there's an element of truth to it. It's not like you're lying to us about what you've observed.
But at the same time, here's a very important question. Has your friend at the FBI ever arrested and gotten another FBI agent convicted for the crimes that they have surely witnessed occurring? Obviously this depends on their exact position, but ask this to any police officer friend that you have. When is the last time that they pulled over another cop and wrote them a ticket for a moving traffic violation? When is the last time they wrote themselves a ticket for a moving traffic violation? The answer is probably going to be never.
Of course it's possible you can find that 0.001%. They probably do exist somewhere, especially if it's a very small police department or FBI Branch office. But let's just play the odds, and everyone who thinks they have an LEO friend who's honest, probably most of them are wrong. What they probably actually have is a friend who usually obeys the law themself but does not force their co-workers to obey it.
She's a family member on my husband's side. I don't know what she's done. She doesn't talk details about her work. But, knowing her, she wouldn't let someone get away with a felony just because she knows them. She's not a police officer. She's super smart, kinda nerdy, introverted, and very progressive. She's horrified by the same things we're horrified by, with the Trump administration, and she despises the current FBI leadership.
I think a lot of y'all have bought into the ACAB narrative a little too hard. Like, yes, are a lot of them bad? Absolutely. I was beaten by a group of cops when I was 18. I'm no stranger to that. But also, there are people that staff internal investigations offices and federal agents that only go after actual murderers. They're not all corrupt street cops.
Everything exists on a spectrum. Given their training and mostly free reign to do crimes themselves, yeah, a lot of street cops are corrupt to some degree. But, I think FBI agents are held, and hold themselves, to a different standard and, they have a much higher level of training/vetting. It makes sense (to me) that they're less corrupt.
It's silly to demonize the organization, as a whole, because of their politically appointed leaders and because street cops generally suck. Is it really so hard to believe that some people at the highest levels of law enforcement actually want to uphold the law? I don't think things are as cartoonishly black and white as you make them out to be.