72
submitted 3 days ago by t3rmit3@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org

Horses, a first-person narrative horror game, was banned from the Epic Games Store just hours before it was set to launch on December 2nd. Then, a day after launch, the Humble store (temporarily) banned it as well. The decision shocked the developers at Santa Ragione, makers of the critically respected Saturnalia, as these storefronts were the homes they’d found for their game two years before it was preemptively banned from Steam.

Valve and Epic say Horses violates their sexual content policies. Humble hasn’t yet said why it banned the game.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Feyd@programming.dev 24 points 3 days ago

I literally don't care if they had a little girl talk to a naked horseman (who is being treated by the game like a regular horse and not a man at all to make a point). My point is that banning things that aren't child porn because of moral outrage leads to the moral crusaders escalating. Next thing you know they're gunning for lgbt themes, then going after violence. It's ridiculous and should be ridiculed and dismissed instead of pretending things are child porn just because you don't like them.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah all I am saying is this isn't surprising. It should have been expected. I doubt you will ever be able to put a child model in a game next to nude adukt models and not get your game pulled from mainstream marketplaces. Thats just the current reality we live in and is not surprising. I mysslf dont think its offensive in this context. But again this outcome is completely expected.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 16 points 3 days ago
  1. The person in these comments that has actually played the game said there isn't actually a single child in the game.
  2. I'm never going to decide to just accept bullshit "because it's not surprising". That's completely asinine.
[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Go to horses.wtf if you really want to know more. I myself dont think this is a hill worth dying on.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You're not even trying to understand what I'm saying if you think that deciding if this particular game is the hill to die on is what I care about. I don't give a shit about this particular game. I care about maintaining the principles of not letting moralists dictate what art and media is appropriate for everyone else.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah and what I am saying is this is stupid shit to do that for. Someone tried to make a "grotesque story experience" and they got too close for comfort for main stream distributors. You can still acquire the game, just not on these platforms. You can still play it in its intended state, just not on those platforms. So what you are arguing for really is for Steam and Epic to distribute this.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah and what I am saying is this is stupid shit to do that for.

You need to work on your reading comprehension.

So what you are arguing for really is for Steam and Epic to distribute this.

Yes, I am. There doesn't appear to be a non-moral-panic reason for it to be barred, and being barred from steam will have a deleterious effect on the game and on the studio's ability to keep making games. I wish company didn't have that power, but they do.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Its their platform. In what world can you force people to sell shit they dont want to sell? You can literally go buy it and experience the art right now. But its not on Steam with achievements and friends seeing me play it so fuck it? Lmao what logic is this? Theres not much left to discuss here tbh. This seems pretty straightforward and your argument is incoherent at this point. They are getting loads of marketing from this

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They are getting loads of marketing from this

This particular game is. It won't always apply to every game, which is why I want digital marketplaces that have so much market dominance they can make or break studios to not choose which games they allow on their platforms based on vibes.

This seems pretty straightforward and your argument is incoherent at this point.

My argument isn't incoherent just because you refuse to engage the scenario from a systemic rather than one-off perspective.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 3 points 2 days ago

Here: https://www.gog.com/en/game/horses play the game. There, thats a major marketplace right there and literally the best one.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

I don't understand why you keep replying without even pretending to engage the points and arguments that I've made.

Do you think saying "the game is available elsewhere" addresses what I said about marketplace dominance at all?

Do you think anything you've said that only applies to this specific game addresses anything I said about systemic problems?

You aren't even trying to have a discussion. You're just saying "I don't like the game anyway so it's good it's not on steam" and pretending it being available on other storefronts and that it happened to go viral has any bearing on any of the points I've made when it obviously doesn't.

In any case, it's pretty clear at this point that you're not going to engage with me faithfully, so I'll be on my way. Have a good day!

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What systemic problems? The systemic problem of distributors not distributing games with children interacting with naked adults? Thats not a fucken problem unless you're a libertarian. The porn game crusade is a huge problem. This is not that. I don't believe this is the game that will push through complete freedom of creation. I also dont believe our current public zeitgeist is ready to handle the complex questions that arise from content like this. I didnt even say I didnt like the game. I havent played it. I'm sure its as thought provoking as Solarium or SOMA. But acting like this is a moral panic overreach of sensorship is a little much when its still available on one of the biggest game marketplaces available AND you'll get the offline installer for it. Go play it. I just might after all this and see what the hubub is actually about.

[-] Rose@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

GOG's market share is around 0.5 to 1%. Steam's is above 75%. So by comparison, GOG is tiny.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 days ago

Sounds like a business discussion was not had if they really are "serious abiut their product" like horses.wtf says they are. Thousands of games go on there each year and dont have this problem.

[-] Rose@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Isn't that part of the discussion? That Valve can just arbitrarily reject a game. Before the payment processors stepped in for example, which was also the time Valve "banned" Horses, Steam had games that had the four-letter r word in their description and Valve didn't care despite being contacted by Collective Shout. One could argue they're lying, but as someone who's worked with most major publishers, I can believe them, because Valve is almost impossible to reach. In my experience, and based on what I've been hearing, most of the time they simply don't reply to press requests. Instead they do these publicity stunts where Gabe Newell will occasionally reply to random email messages from people online, knowing the reply will be posted to social media, or he'll do an interview with a nobody on YouTube.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

There was one in the version they sent to Steam. That's what started all this.

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
72 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

33180 readers
110 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS