678
submitted 4 weeks ago by solrize@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

"It’s safe to say that the people who volunteered to “shape” the initiative want it dead and buried. Of the 52 responses at the time of writing, all rejected the idea and asked Mozilla to stop shoving AI features into Firefox."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

So much whining... Please get to know the things you attack, before you embarrass yourself.

Do you know what a "build in AI" is? It's just some algorithms that makes your day easier. And no one steals your data... sigh

It's a local collection of algorithms, and you are quite safe. You probably already use it in so many ways you can't count them - it's just not called "AI" which I guess is the trigger word for you...

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

So much wtf. Please name one way I use AI without knowing it, and ways that enrage me don't count.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 4 weeks ago

Using a search engine would be one.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Nope. The "AI summary" is something I disable on Google and I try to actively avoid it because it enrages me. It's total dogshit.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 1 points 3 weeks ago

The algorithms to determine which pages are most relevant to your query are traditionally seen as AI too. They're just not labelled as such (which was the point), and predate the current AI hype.

I hadn't even thought about the "AI modes" that search engines are incorporating nowadays though, so I get the confusion.

[-] voodooattack@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That’s a fair point. But search algorithms fall under the “recommender system” umbrella, which are a very different family from the agentic AI we’re discussing here.

Both are AIs, but with very different use cases. In the same way, you could technically classify both your gaming PC and phone as computers, and you’d be correct.

Edit: links

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 1 points 3 weeks ago

It was my impression that the thread started wasn't just talking about agentic AI. And I think a lot of the "anti AI folks" here are also angry about recent non-agentic AI additions that Mozilla added, such as e.g. tab recommendations for tab groups.

[-] voodooattack@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The post is about the new AI Window feature, and here’s its description from Mozilla’s own announcement:

Now, we’re excited to invite you to help shape the work on our next innovation: an AI Window. It’s a new, intelligent and user-controlled space we’re building in Firefox that lets you chat with an AI assistant and get help while you browse, all on your terms. Completely opt-in, you have full control, and if you try it and find it’s not for you, you can choose to switch it off.

So, definitely agentic.

And I think a lot of the "anti AI folks" here are also angry about recent non-agentic AI additions that Mozilla added, such as e.g. tab recommendations for tab groups.

I’ll speak honestly: I’m not happy with that either. But that’s incidental to this topic. The agentic component is my biggest concern.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 1 points 3 weeks ago

Hmm could be different commenting styles; I, and I think the thread started as well, regularly broaden a topic in response to an article. So my interpretation when they spoke about people having "AI as a trigger word" was that they were referring to people with concerns about more than just agentic AI. But if you want to limit it to that, feel free to ignore my original reference to search engines.

[-] voodooattack@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

See my reply to the sibling comment - I wasn't referring to the "AI summary".

[-] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well, then give me a report of everything you use IT for... You phone, apps, tablets, computers, smart tv's and so forth?

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Um, nah.. ? I actively avoid half those things and yet use computers constantly. The burden would be on you. So perhaps you can actually give examples that would be true of a lot of people. I feel like you think lemmy users are like most people and just along with what's popular, but that's not the case, particularly with computing concerns.

[-] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Damn you are not really well, are you? You want me to tell you exactly where you use build in "AI" that helps you make decisions, but you won't tell me what you use?!? I don't have to prove anything. My claim stands. I can see that you are using some kind of computer, and the internet. You are using algorithms that act the way AI does... But I guess you are too blind to see... That's on you. Keep living in your little illusion of a world. 🙃

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Damn you are not really well, are you?

Says the person who wants a full inventory of my computing hardware. What a fucking bizarre human.

[-] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well, you wanted me to tell you what AI-like algorithms you were using - and you expect me to do that from no information? You really are not well...

[-] voodooattack@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So much whining... Please get to know the things you attack, before you embarrass yourself.

I’m a senior full-stack engineer at a recruitment startup. I’m the one responsible for the AI side of things. We do document analysis of résumés and all kinds of identification documents and photos. We also run various assistant chatbots that interact with users and accept file uploads, do job interviews and much more. I think I know enough not to embarrass myself.

Do you know what a "build in AI" is? It's just some algorithms that makes your day easier.

No. A “built-in AI” is not a collection of “magic algorithms” that suddenly make life better. Working with AI is some of the worst hours I’ve ever spent of my life. Writing increasingly convoluted prompts to make it follow explicitly stated instructions for the N-th time in order not to misuse tools or output the correct structured data is not magic. It’s an exercise in futility most of the time.

And no one steals your data... sigh

It's a local collection of algorithms, and you are quite safe.

So… You’re introducing an autonomous agent between you and the web you’re browsing. With the sole purpose of making decisions and taking actions on your behalf. And this thing is already proven to have the capability to HALLUCINATE.

Aside from all the privacy concerns and assuming that the models actually run locally; all code can have bugs, and worse: this “magic tool” is an amorphous collection of floating point numbers and you can’t debug a neural net’s weights.

If this thing has permission to freely interact with web pages, then sorry, your data will never be safe.

You probably already use it in so many ways you can't count them - it's just not called "AI" which I guess is the trigger word for you...

I think you’re the one confusing the terminology.

[-] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, you work for Mozilla Firefox, do you?

Being childish and trying to turn what I say into "magic algorithms"

GZ with your made up title, which must be made up, given the crazy ramblings you are making.

The "AI" that Firefox is implementing is not "autonomous" - do look up the definitions, please! It is not sentient, it can't hallucinate, since it is not sentient. What the big tech are making (their LLM) can't hallucinate either - they just do something that looks like it, and we put silly terms on it, like hallucinating. You are NOT getting a neural network on your own computer when you install Firefox - now you are just being daft!

You are confused, paranoid and really prove, that you should get to know what you are talking about. sigh

[-] voodooattack@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Are you purposefully trolling or just that level of ignorant? I’m done responding here regardless, just curious.

[-] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'll take that as a no, you are not working for Mozilla. You are being childish by calling it "magic algorithms". You don't even know what kind of "AI" FF are talking about...

I would run too, if I were caught in the lies you have spun here.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
678 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

21443 readers
1 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS