772

A society is always about 3 days of hunger away from a violent revolution. Start your clocks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 20 points 2 days ago

Shame she decided to support wildly unpopular policy and messaging instead of winning.

[-] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Shame millions of leftists had advanced warning of Project 2025, chose to ignore it and boycott the only viable other candidate anyway, and now are living with the concenquences of that inaction.

But they're still only blaming Kamala and the Dem party, rather than taking a moment for self reflection as to how they willingly surrendered the country to fascism and damned marginalized groups to hell on Earth.

Kamala was a shitty candidate, but the left who boycotted the vote owns their own inaction. It's not Kamala's fault everyone had a year advance warning on Project 2025 and chose to do nothing anyway.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 days ago

A friend of mine was sincerely advancing the idea that it's better that trump wins, because less-bad candidates like Harris just let people coast by without doing much as the world gets worse. He thinks something like Trump will be really bad, and people will demand more radical change. I think you can call that acellerationism. Pretty easy position to hold as a wealthy professional who owns property, I guess.

Personally, I'd rather people organize and try to make the world better without the worst people in the world having most of the power. Seems easier that way to me.

[-] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I find this to be the most common occurrence of accelerationists.

The most willing to send millions to their graves to achieve what they believe is socialism, while they themselves will never pick up a rifle and fight for it.

They're identical to every fat cat chicken-hawk piece of shit that sends young Americans to die in wars for the profit of political donors.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

Nothing we could have done would have made genocide, the MoSt lEtHaL miLiTary electable. The only thing we could have done was riot to get a candidate and policies capable of winning.

[-] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You're missing the point entirely.

Everyone agrees Kamala was shit. That's not the point.

The point is millions of leftists, the people who are supposed to be advocates for marginalized peoples, absolutely refused to be advocates for said marginalized peoples when the easiest possible way to do it was to show up and vote for Kamala.

Was Kamala shit? Yes.

Would all these marginalized people be sent to concentration camps whole the government abandons the rule of law entirely and ends democracy under Kamala?

Obviously no.

Yet so many millions of leftists, especially those in swing states, decided to surrender these marginalized people to the fourth Reich instead.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

The only lesson here is not to get to the point where the only alternative to fascism are libs who would prefer fascism to socialism. We lost when we allowed the dems to run on unelectable policy.

[-] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

My dude, that decision was made almost 250 years ago.

We were getting to that point by primary neo-libs out of office and putting in more and more progressives. Progressives willing to end the Electoral College.

That is entirely up in flames now. US democracy is gone. Its not "at risk", its already fucking dead. Straight up gone and never to come back.

Boycotting Kamala didn't make us rise above the 2 party system, it placed us firmly in a permenant 1 party system under fascism.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Nothing we could have done would have changed the outcome then. You can't make sending the cops to kick the shit out of the activated college students who make up your ground game popular.

[-] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, because we all know that pro-palestine protestors are doing so much better under Zionist fascism than the Zionist led democracy from last year.

Oh wait no, its moved from police cruelty to deportation and concentration camps. Its both insanely worse and was very predictable under Project 2025 that we knew about over a year in advance.

Also, wait till you hear about what ICE is doing (and we knew they would because of P2025)

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
772 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26165 readers
2208 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS