298
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
298 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
12595 readers
590 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
To be fair, Linux would perform so poorly too, if it had 194 data extraction programs running in the background. This comparison is clearly unfair.
Are you able to remove the 194 data extraction programs that are running in the background as user?
Copilot probably won't let you
I am sorry Dave, I am afraid I can't do that.
Tbf if Linux was running at the same tdp it would be the same speed, as shown by 13w tests
The 17w is actually 16w vs 20w+ and 35w is 25w vs 35w+.
So the article is very wrong and misleading. Watch the actual video and post attention to the power draw and clock speeds.