195
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
195 points (100.0% liked)
World News
50689 readers
2406 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
- Blogsites are treated in the same manner as social media sites. Medium, Blogger, Substack, etc. are not valid news links regardless of who is posting them. Yes, legitimate news sites use Blogging platforms, they also use Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube and we don't allow those links either.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why are all these women conservative? What's there to gain for them? I feel like conservative views work against women rather than for them? At least that's what I've grown up believing.
"Rich" is actually the best gender to be.
Some times I wonder. But yeah... Probably.
The class war almost invariably underpins the other apparent social conflicts.
I don't they care about other women. Or people in general. If you an upper class woman running for politics then such policies would never affect you personally. Consequences are for "lesser" people.
This is just what she choose to built her political career upon, because such views are popular in Japan and therefore she would be able garner support and boring base. What matters is that it will get her to power. I sincerely doubt she actually believes into any of that.
Women aren't immune from being stupid fucking idiots. Just look at all of the Republican female politicians and entertainment pundits.
Oh so true. Stupidity is not tied to gender, innit.
Not idiotic, just evil and self-serving. Hell is not a male-only space. 🤷
It can be all 3!
It's so fucking spineless. People shouldn't be able to pursue a political career. They should be chosen to lead by peers or some other weird system. Like okay now it's my turn to bear the responsibility. Otherwise it becomes something people pursue, and it becomes all about the power and the money. Disgusting.
Well the usual response to this is that people who don't want to be in position of power would do a shit job at it (to the point of being net negative).
Most people don't want "bear the responsibility", they want someone else to do it.
I say let's have a system whereby if the ruler(s) do a good job according to the wide public, they are rewarded accordingly with taxes. If they do a shit job, they are rewarded with nothing. This way, we get politicians working for us rather than for themselves. I mean it would be also for themselves, but any net gain for them would be forced out of altruism. This way, you would aspire to be a hero if you could manage. And if you weren't fit to rule, you'd resign very quickly because it would be a waste of your time to gain nothing.
Any holes to poke through this? 👂🔥 All ears! Let's build a better system!
I guess one hole I could poke myself is it the wide public wanted anarchy and war and garbage like that. But we'd have to establish some ground rules to begin with, like the stuff that protects humans and human rights. Those cannot be taken away. Damn. I had a sleep and this became harder than I thought.
This post is funny, because the folks wanting to oppress others have the most to gain by careering a position of power and influence. Why not be the PM of an aging population?
$$
If you are in power, your gender becomes irrelevant.
Why else would a fuckton of oppressive monarchs be women?
I got it, yeah. Depressing af isn't it.
Since no one else said it yet, it's called "pulling up the ladder behind you".
The only way to get ahead of being subjugated is to become one of the subjugators yourself. It's been most women politicians go to move in modern history, "Join the ruling class before I'm beneath their heel" as the only solution their brains can come up with for survival, even though in the end that always ends up happening anyway.
"First they came for the communists..."