952
morphology-based phylogeny (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Is there such a thing as real taxonomy

in the unlikely case that this is a serious question: yes, there is, at least for eukaryotes.

for eukaryotes (things that have a cellular nucleus) there are "species" which are groups of organisms that can't produce offspring with each other. The reasons are typically (i think?) that the genetic differences between two species are too great and any offspring would therefore have such a self-incompatible set of genes that they cannot live with.

for prokaryotes (bacteria) the situation is a bit different. due to horizontal gene transfer, they can exchange genes with practically ever other strain of bacteria, as long as the environmental circumstances are right. (and the result is often viable, i.e. the resulting bacteria can live that way). as a consequence, there are not so clearly defined "species" for bacteria. however, there are still groups of bacteria that have a higher similarity to each other, so we still group them together and give them names.

[-] flora_explora@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago

This isn't generally true for eukaryotes either. In plants, hybridization is a huge thing and also polyploidy. So for some groups of plants we struggle to put them in neat boxes as well.

And zooming out to a larger view on taxonomy, plant taxonomy has seen some huge changes in the last decades with the various APG (angiosperm phylogeny group) publishings rearranging many if not most orders, families and genera of angiosperm plants.

yeah ... plants have hybridization, yeah, i'm still reading into this.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Are there not worthwhile distinctions between sepcies that can interbreed? I remember learning from an anthro professor there are horses for examples that literally have different amounts of chromosomes that can interbreed fine. I still don't see how ability to have viable offspring isn't also just an arbitrary distinction I guess, especially when there's whole classifications of life that break that rule into pieces.

[-] runner_g 3 points 1 week ago

While a little arbitrary, we use "ability to produce viable offspring" as a metric of speciation. Two animals can bone and create an offspring, but that offspring has to have live gametes (egg/sperm) for the parents to be considered the same species.

While a little arbitrary

it's not that arbitrary as you might think. genetics is literally all about mutating, mixing and recombining genes, and producing viable offspring together is a huge part of that. that is why the concept of species is so important.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
952 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

17204 readers
1869 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS