870
submitted 1 year ago by ShyDrusi@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Amazing. Not one word of that was true. Impressive accomplishment.

No, Hunter wasn't doing "almost the same shit." No, it wasn't "worse." And the reason it gets "shouted down" is because it's lying bullshit, and we've got no reason to put up with that.

This "both sides" garbage - as if Hunter name-dropping his dad is identical to Trump's kids literally selling access to theirs - with his enthusiastic involvement - is reprehensible. It's disgusting, it's sick, and it's disingenuous.

[-] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://www.politico.eu/article/joe-biden-presidential-bid-family-business-history-democrats/

K

It’s really hard to believe y’all aren’t bots in the first place but that little bit of Gilbert and Sullivan at the end was pretty good.

[-] Jeff@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From that article since we are talking Trumplestiltskin the CheetosRaper endorsing his KorruptoKidz:

There’s no evidence that Joe Biden used his power inappropriately or took action to benefit his relatives with respect to these ventures. These entanglements could pose problems for Democrats as they seek to draw a contrast with President Donald Trump, who they accuse of corruption for mixing politics with his own family’s business ventures.

I left the rest in there since this is from 2019 and pre-Traitor Sedition. I do not like the Bidens anymore than the Kennedys or Clinton’s but these do not compare.

We’re not talking about Joe?

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Hunter Biden and his uncle literally ran a mutual fund that he sold to investors as giving access to Joe. The FBI shut it down."

But you were. That was you. You brought up Joe Biden. Which again, where is the evidence for that? Because your article has zero evidence for actual "access" being sold and granted.

The other person quoted your article saying that there was no evidence Joe Biden used his position to benefit any of his family's business dealings. Even if Hunter was going around saying "do you know who my dad is", if Joe Biden didn't have anything to do with it, it didn't do anything. We don't throw people in jail for name dropping.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
870 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3029 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS