201

Reminds me of this:

I think atproto is a good protocol, but god bluesky-the-company is dogshit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago

I'm so confused reading all this.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago

Their argument is something like this:

People might say something like "ai is incapable of thinking" or "ai is stupid", but if you replace the word "ai" with something like "women", you're saying something unacceptable.

[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So they're attributing personhood to AI.

Before it has come anywhere close to meaningfully mimicking conciousness.

Are they stupid?

[-] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 13 points 1 day ago

AI believers believe that stringing random words together is equal to consciousness, they absolutely are stupid.

[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Perhaps because it reflects their level of consciousness.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
201 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2205 readers
276 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS