497
gnome
(quokk.au)
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
It seems to be the modern approach to basically everything.
Killing someone is bad. You can’t kill someone even if it makes money for you. But you can definitely deny them life-saving care that they’ve already paid for.
Employing someone without granting them the standard rights all employees are entitled to is bad. You can’t do it, even if it’s profitable. But if you employ them as a “gig work platform”, that’s not really employment.
Taking someone else’s work without paying for it and selling it as your own is bad. You can’t do it, even if it’s profitable. But if you mix it together with a billion other people’s work and use server farms to chop it up and recombine it, that’s fine.
It’s the same pattern over and over: powerful people want to do bad shit, and they can’t do it directly, so they find ways to break it down into a billion little steps that are each individually so innocuous that you can’t prohibit them.
It is a weaponization of ambiguity on where to draw the line; sailing the Ship of Theseus all the way from one end of morality to another