248

Want a Trek community not based on Lemmy.world? Check out !Risa@lemmy.dbzer0.com // Alt Link for Piefed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EmoPolarbear@lemmy.ca 59 points 2 days ago

Umm actually... Those are pathfinder iconics, that's flirting in Golarion baby.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 16 points 2 days ago

Oh that's good, because I was gonna say, tieflings don't have prehensile tails in the Realms.

[-] Archpawn@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I didn't realize they did in Pathfinder. Neat.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 14 points 2 days ago

Looks like the followup ancestry feat is more applicable to this image. I do like the idea of it costing an ancestry feat to get though. Implies it's a feature some nephilim have, but not the majority.

[-] Archpawn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But is that really worth two feats? It seems like such a niche use case.

[-] kichae@wanderingadventure.party 1 points 4 hours ago

If you pick feats in a vacuum, based on how impactful you expect them to be in the mean average of all sessions across all tables, sure.

But you probably shouldn't pick feats that way. They should either be an expression of your character concept, or a reaction to the campaign you're currently playing.

[-] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

For a PC? Probably not, though it is an ancestory feat and those tend to be fairly weak. For an NPC social rogue sent to annoy the players? Absolutely!

and you can’t use it to hold items

Aw...

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
248 points (100.0% liked)

RPGMemes

13856 readers
748 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS