1115
Oh dear (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Philharmonic3@lemmy.world 76 points 2 weeks ago

Why is the first wheel always shown as stone? Surely a log would have lent itself to the discovery of rolling much more readily

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.org 58 points 2 weeks ago

Its called the stone age, not the log age, duh.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Not when I'm done with it

[-] ronl2k@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

According to Google, what we call The Stone Age also included the use of wood products. They were often used together.

[-] deltatangothree@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

I would guess logs don't lend themselves to the historical/fossil whatever record as well as stone does. The oldest wheels we've found are stone because any potential log ones deteriorated, and this was all before written records.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

That entire idea is so absurd I had to check.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel

Looks like the first transportation-related evidence of wheel we have was made of clay (probably because it was a toy). The first transportation-related actual wheel that we found was made of wood. The first wheel-shaped object we found wasn't used for transportation and was made of wood.

Stone is just a really bad material for making wheels. But I wrongly expected to see some metal ones on the list.

[-] spongeborgcubepants@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

The logs have since been rotated, got it.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Imagin if logs were actually perfect material for designing that one shape that produces infinite energy, food, and research.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Do you see any trees in that drawing? It seems cavemen existed exclusively in barren volcanic wastelands.

[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Haha yes, cavemen only lived in caves far away from forests of course.

Or maybe forests are just too complicated to draw for a cartoon.

[-] pipe01@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

Well duh, they're cavemen not forestmen

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Obviously the dinosaurs were eating all the trees

[-] ronl2k@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Wheels were useless anyway until the invention of the axle, around 3500 BCE.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

What good's an axle without...the grabby thing that holds the axle or whatever it connects to?

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Not to mention the lack of internal combustion engines to power the whole thing.

[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago

Because the oldest reference disks we have are millstones? Idk. They always look like millstones to me

[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

When it was on TV, the Flintstones cartoon made it to everyone's mind.

Rolling logs is something even beavers have probably been rediscovering over the eras.

[-] UncleMagpie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The Flintstones fascinated me when I was a kid because everything had already been invented but it was just made out of rocks and wood instead of metal and plastic. So for example they had a stone dishwasher appliance powered by a bird or something.

[-] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Might have been grinding wheels for wheat; don’t have to be replaced as often and if in a stone track don’t have to worry as much about breakage. But that’s just a theory…. A history theory… or at least a history conjecture

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
1115 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

19705 readers
3563 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS