654
Why u mad?
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
654 points (100.0% liked)
Political Memes
1940 readers
497 users here now
Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
To everyone here that feels Nazis deserve free speech and sympathy.
They do not.
Handling Nazi with kid gloves is how we got here.
Handling Nazis with im kid gloves is how the Holocaust happened.
History is literally repeating itself and anyone sympathetic with Nazis is complicit.
Edit: Most of us know someone who's grandparents died fighting Nazis. Ignoring and empathizing with Nazi's is spitting on their graves.
I don't know bout y'all but the ONLY gloves you should use when handling Nazis is the kind with spikes protruding from the business end.
OK but first make sure they're an actual Nazi and not one of that "someone who disagrees with me" kind of almost certainly not a Nazi.
For sure.
I've read my Asmiov. "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent."
But we're complex emotional beings and sometimes our amygdala lurches up from the warm fetid swamp it usually lazes around in and utters things we act on before slower, more complex neurological bureaucracy can veto. Actual nazis will do that to the most disciplined of us.
Maybe the thick yellow rubber ones if you need to mop up after a body
Gross yellow gloves are for household cleaning. Blue gloves are for disposing of bodies, it's like the colour coded chopping blocks in kitchens
I’d suggest the black nitrile to be less conspicuous, and get the thick ones in case it snags on a dumpster or something.
The orange ones have grip added for when things get slick.
China did what? From everything I've seen and read, de-radicalization is a pretty generous way of putting it but feel free to educate me.
Go back to ml
In a truly tolerant society, only one thing should not be tolerated.
Intolerance.
Looks like the mods in here really don’t want y’all to know that the Uyghur “genocide” was a western hoax.
https://law.stanford.edu/press/state-department-lawyers-concluded-insufficient-evidence-to-prove-genocide-in-china/
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202311/1301268.shtml
Quibble all you want about whether it is a genocide or not, but the abuse of Uyghurs by the Chinese government is in no way a hoax. It is institutionalized oppression of the highest order.
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/against-their-will-the-situation-in-xinjiang
Do you have a reputable source? A US government agency’s info is as reputable as Israel’s info on Gaza. They’re the main ones crafting the bullshit.
https://apnews.com/article/europe-religion-china-genocides-xi-jinping-9f20b0f7a77b1071ad32c81241678f3b
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/2/china-targets-friendly-media-diplomats-to-tell-story-of-xinjiang
Are we considering the UN's report definitive then? Or did you just cherry-pick a paywalled article based on the title?
China responsible for ‘serious human rights violations’ in Xinjiang province: UN human rights report
The UN did not accuse China. Michelle Bachelet did. This is a common problem with these UN human rights abuse claims, where a single political appointee makes a claim, and the propagandists spread it as having full UN backing. They did the same thing to spread the sexual violence hoax for the Israeli Oct 7th propaganda. It’s not even the first time they’ve done this with the Uyghurs:
https://thegrayzone.com/2018/08/23/un-did-not-report-china-internment-camps-uighur-muslims/amp/
I tried to un-paywall the article you linked, and it brought up the UN report. It's possible it was the wrong article.
Do you have an un-paywalled link? Or do I just trust it without reading it?
Why should you trust Chinese sources to tell you about a genocide in China? That'd be like trusting CNN to tell you billionaires are evil.
It’s not paywalled for me, but a lot of it is just repeating grayzone reporting.
https://thegrayzone.com/2021/10/17/uyghur-tribunal-us-government-china/amp/
I’m not saying to trust China. I’m saying to trust the trusted third parties who have investigated it. Really were so far past the hoax at this point, you can even trust the state propagandists who’ve already admitted they didn’t have the evidence they claimed.
Right now, you’re trusting decade old claims from intelligence agencies, who aren’t even still pushing those narratives you’re clinging to, and who were exposed as radicalizing the Uyghurs to destabilize the region (as they’ve done countless other times this past century).