655

For months, Google has maintained that the web is “thriving,” AI isn’t tanking traffic, and its search engine is sending people to a wider variety of websites than ever. But in a court filing from last week, Google admitted that “the open web is already in rapid decline” (with regard to advertising, kinda-sorta)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

Came out of government-funded research actually. Back when we could still achieve scientific feats on behalf of our country.

[-] Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It was private at that time. My point is that it spread so quickly to millions of people worldwide because of capitalists specifically the telecom companies and ISPs stepping in. Without them, the internet could never have developed on such a scale.

[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

The telecom companies got paid by the government to do it, they just as easily could have paid themselves to do it but we as a society are allergic to the idea of taking money out of the hands of poor billionaires and their potential profits

[-] Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

That doesn’t undermine my argument that it was ultimately because of the capitalists that the internet spread in the first place.

[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

It does undermine your argument though, because you are saying that it only spread because of capitalists. I'm telling you it spread because of government funding and capitalists were just the medium by which the funding was used. The capitalist part is replaceable and unnecessary.

[-] Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm telling you it spread because of government funding and capitalists were just the medium by which the funding was used.

It doesn’t work just by you saying it. According to multiple sources, the government clearly didn’t want to fund commercial internet and largely backed out during the 90s.

The capitalist part is replaceable and unnecessary.

It doesn’t matter if you think it’s replaceable, I can make that claim too. What matters is what actually happened in reality.

[-] Blemgo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Could you explain how it doesn't undermine your argument?

[-] despicable@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago

And how would you know without the internet being developed under a different system at the time?

[-] Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

That’s not an argument. I don’t need to speculate on hypotheticals when reality already proves the point.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 points 3 weeks ago

The internet would not have existed without government investment. Back when the idea of the internet was being floated around in the early 1960s the US government did contact every major telecom company in the country snd all flat out refused meaning the government had to publically foot the bill (and the work).

No, capitalists would never, ever have invented the internet.

[-] Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

And I never said that they invented the internet.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 1 points 3 weeks ago

No, but you implied it, and you also implied that the reason we have it grow as it did is because of the government. This is bullshit. Capitalists did not invent that or the system anymore than they would have invented telegraphy, radio, telephones, and other such stuff. Even shit like the telephone was done initially out of a 'hey do you think it can be done?' by Alexander Graham Bell (And yes, I am sure you will bring up Elisha Grey and the race to the patent office, but even that is irrelevant).

[-] Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I’ve made my case, and I never said that. What you do with this information is up to you.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

You are speculating on hypotheticals though, since no one can know for certain how things would have unfolded in a different world.

I'm not even going to argue that capitalism doesn't get you some positive outcomes for certain people.

[-] Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

How am I speculating when my argument is based on reality?

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

You're speculating that an internet wouldn't have emerged without capitalism. Capitalism exists, therefore we can't know if that's true or not.

[-] Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly, we can’t know if that’s true or not, but we do know it emerged in reality because of capitalism. That’s all we need to make a case for capitalism, since real-life examples always outweigh imaginary ones.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
655 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

75701 readers
2349 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS