571
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
571 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3286 readers
906 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes.
Post news related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Cool that they can just do this.
Kavanaugh did, in a concurrence. I strongly disagree with his Opinion but at least he put words to paper. the others didn't, so I assume the conservatives are fighting about the legal basis for their ruling.
they will have to eventually explain themselves at least, once this case makes it to the regular docket.
yeah, it turns out unelected, lifetime appointees with the power to interpret the law with no oversight was a bad idea.
If they don't have to explain themselves, then they shouldn't expect one when the angry mob shows up at their door 🤷