39
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
39 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
2147 readers
231 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This writer seems to be missing the point. The point was not what HitchBOT was. By creating HitchBOT, its makers invited the world to play pretend with them: to pretend (for entertainment purposes!) that HitchBOT was a whimsical hitchhiker in need of aid, and to collectively see how far the participants in this game could get it. Destroying HitchBOT selfishly ended the game for everyone else.
If Hillary were president HitchBot would still be alive
E: followup, from wikipedia:
As a metaphor for liberal fantasy and optimism, hitchbot was doomed to die, one way or another.
This commenter seems to be missing the point about the point.
I'm sorry, I'm afraid it also flies over my head. Can you explain it to me? Is it sarcasm I failed to pick up?
no
❤️
It's true, I don't get it.
I'm also still waiting for an explanation. I thought asking nicely would net an explanation, but I only got a snarky response. I feel like I'm in the wrong place if I genuinely want to understand it
you have 16 posts on Lemmy and most of them are you Genuinely Curiously JAQing off about shit you already damn well knew before going into the thread so lol no nobody owes you a fucking explanation