38
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)
news
82 readers
488 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
Poland must be itching for an Article 5 reason given the Ukraine bullshit. Maybe EU marches on Moscow, so we remove the threat once and for all.
Poland has no nukes. Russia does. If Poland were to somehow march to Moscow and the threat was real, Poland would cease to exist
Poland is NATO, so yes, they do have nukes. Maybe not ours, due to the current "leadership", but plenty of others.
NATO is a defense treaty. It triggers if Poland is attacked. If Poland attacks the mutual defense clause doesn't trigger.
I don’t really see Frenchmen risking getting nuked only so that Poland can march on Moscow
Coordinated cut-off-the-head strike. High risk of retaliatory nukes, unless the intel is good and those icbms can be sabotaged. Ukraine has already demonstrated many deep coordinated strikes.