2081
Language (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 months ago by not_IO to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 months ago

I can't even get people to switch to LibreOffice, not cuz they use some advanced MS Office feature but because the interface "looks dated". So they'd rather pay a subscription for life to use software that spies on them than download free software that does what they need but has a 2010s style interface.

Humans suck so much.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ngl, I installed a few OnlyOffices just because of UI.
It has ribbon UI and about the same placement of buttons as MS Office stuff.

It's fine.

(Based in Latvia, but they had a Russian momma, now Singapore.)

[-] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Humans are creatures of habit, and risk averse most of the time. Risk, being change of any sort when things seem "stable."

All you can do is lead by example and enjoy life and tell those poor souls they're stupid for spending money for something they can change the look like MS Office easily.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

because the interface “looks dated”.

The real issue is M$ intentionally not following standards, so that opening an Office doc may or may not properly render in other suites. Hooray for EEE. Fuckers.

[-] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Eh, I haven't had that issue in years. Maybe its a problem for office workers who make extremely complicated documents and spreadsheets, but those aren't the kinds of people I'm talking about.

EDIT: Not implying you're wrong about M$ fake open standards bullshit, just that I don't think its a huge concern for the average home user.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I get what you are saying but is it really too much to ask for an interface that looks like it belongs there?

[-] Wolf@lemmy.today 8 points 2 months ago

I prefer the old school style menus and such. I stopped using MS Word around the time that they came out with the 'ribbon' style menus or whatever it's called, so if they 'update' it I sure hope it's as an option or a fork.

I can understand people who grew up with it or who have spent years using it might like it better though.

[-] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

For legally free and open software that has to maintain UI consistency across Windows, MacOS, and the plethora of open desktop environments? Yes, yes it is.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

No it’s not. There are other free and open software offerings that function cross platform and do it more cleanly.

[-] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

For a project as big and old and full of legacy code as LibreOffice, I think their interface is pretty great. And its way more customizable than MS Office. Its just not the absolute latest and greatest in styling.

And, if MS didn't make it so hard to maintain compatibility with their "open" file format, TDF might be able to put more resources into UX. As it is, they have to reverse engineer all the nonconforming BS that Microsoft puts in their OOXML implementation.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
2081 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

9614 readers
8 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS