287
submitted 2 days ago by ComradePedro@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Google has been trying to make Android proprietary for a few years now, and that's not news, as many AOSP default apps have been abandoned over time in favor of proprietary Google ones. This was never a huge problem for me, as you can still use those apps without network access or use open source alternatives like Fossify on a custom ROM.

However, the situation is quickly getting worse, now that Google is actively trying to prevent the development of custom ROMs and taking a page from Apple's book by forcing developers to beg them for permission to release apps on the Android platform, even outside of the Play Store - giving Google full control.

Is there still any hope left for privacy respecting Android ROMs? What do you think will happen next? And what would be your suggestions for those looking for a phone in 2025?

If you have a different perspective on the situation, also please comment below!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

They obviously don’t do that to please Google.

I know, it's supposedly 'cos they're the only good phones, which is a kinda weird take considering the diversity of devices out there but i'm not into the gory details.

You can just read the requirements section on the FAQ page of their website. It explains the reasoning. It's all based on technical reasons: https://grapheneos.org/faq#device-support

[-] passepartout@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There are no phones with working encryption (a must imho and a lot of others) except the ones I listed in my initial comment. iPhones are no option because they are not unlockable. Samsung recently announced they will remove the option to unlock the bootloader as well. They also have a very broad and everchanging lineup of phones.

Google Pixel has been more of a hardware and software reference to developers than a Phone people would usually buy up until the redesign with the Pixel 6. There are so many hardware and software features that make it the perfect device to develop against (up until the recent events lol).

I'd recommend you to read their own documentation on this topic.

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

They were a good device to develop against, at least until they started catching fire for multiple generations.

They had to degrade the 4A, a couple of 6As burst into flames. My mom has a 7, and it was overheating like mad, and seemed like it was possibly going to burst into flames. I won't trust a Google device at least for several years after they've fixed these battery issues.

The Pixel 1 and the Pixel 2 were great. I even had the Pixel 3a, and it was a decent device. But since then, I've not trusted Google. Not recently.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
287 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

41276 readers
278 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS