141
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
141 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
50181 readers
166 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I just want to be clear. Blahaj lemmy does not allow invalidating of other folks identities.
The comment alluded to Transracial identities as a (very cherry-picked and extreme) example. I do really, genuinely wonder whether we should uncritically accept the validity of people who identify as transracial, especially people who benefit from whiteness but self-identify as a member of a marginalized race. What is the instances stance on transracial identities? Another question- do you have racially marginalized mods, and how do they feel about the subject?
The instance stance is that we don't allow people to undermine other folks identities. Transmeds think they're doing the "right thing" for trans folk because they think that they're protecting the "real" trans folk. People who want to undermine non binary identities, people who want to undermine therian identities etc, people who want to undermine neopronoun users, will always have a reason for it, often based around acceptability in the eyes of broader cishet society.
Just because you think there is a good reason to undermine those specific identities doesn't make it ok. You and I, and anyone else is not the arbiter of anyones identities except their own, and the moment you feel that you do get to have an opinion on the validity of someone elses identity, is the moment you have put yourself above them.
There are absolutely trolls who will misuse this kind of acceptance. But even that doesn't make it ok for you or I to install ourselves as arbitrators of other folks identity. The answer to the trolls doesn't change just because they're trolling by bad faith use of identity. The answer still remains that you remove them when they're trolling becomes apparent. But on this instance, that removal is done in a way that doesn't empower folk looking for excuses to invalidate others.