814

Glad they're taking off the gloves a little, but it's always been a non-option to just make our lives significantly and irrevocably better like M4A or the PRO act and although they're good at trying and failing, they never talk about the consequences as dire as they actually are with few exceptions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MarriedCavelady50@lemmy.ml 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Going to hell for smiling now, 🤦‍♀️

Also, picking the least shitty option is always better than being ok with the shitty option. If you want better options then go start actively volunteering for a good option.

[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago

Or you know reject the false binary being presented and organize the change needed outside of electoral politics.

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago

Shh, you're telling people to actually do something instead of blindly following the status quo and hoping someone does it for them.

[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

There is nothing false about the two party binary

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 days ago
[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's true, but our system leads to two party duopolies.

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Because we live in a country of reactionaries who have allowed themselves to be controlled by that system instead of organizing to take back control of it themselves.

[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

No, the design/implementation of the system itself results in two dominant parties. It is possible for new parties to be created, but without a change to the system, that would still result in a two party duopoly, just with different parties.

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

without a change to the system

That's the whole point but it won't change unless we change what we are doing, cause it clearly isn't working.

Those parties are only dominant because people fall in line. If people stopped falling in line and changed who they gave their support to, those parties would no longer be dominant.

Their power relies on our capitulation. If we want other parties to win, then we have to give our vote to them and hope that others will do the same. If I keep giving up my vote to someone else that's a guaranteed way for the person I actually want to lose.

Frankly, I believe the entire system of hierarchical, representative democracy is a failed system to begin with and, especially under the influence of a capitalist economy, will inevitably collapse into fascism. Parliamentary democracy is only marginally better. Until we abandon this system and begin governing ourselves in a horizontal structure, it will never change for the better for the working class. Everything else is just spinning wheels, maintaining an inherently oppressive status quo.

[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But you can't change the system until you win, and in our system the only way to win is to be one of the Big Two. Bull Moose couldn't even do it with a former president.

[-] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Sure they do. And if you vote for one in a FPTP system, it's the same as throwing your ballot in the garbage.

[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hey, that's not true!

The real effect is giving an advantage to the main party that the 3rd party is less similar to.

[-] Corn@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago

Ok, and when they ratfuck the good option and instead give you republican-lite?

[-] brendansimms@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

start firearms training and put an antifa patch on your denim jacket, join an anarchist reading club and start talking about Mao's policies at family functions.

[-] MarriedCavelady50@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago

Learn what they did and work against it? Strategies change all the time.

Being ok with the republican choice is accelerationism, which always fucks over everybody.

[-] Corn@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago

Learning what they did doesn't help, the only tool we have to make sure ratfucking isn't an effective way for conservatives to gain power. When progressives get ratfucked, the republican agenda moves forward no matter if a republican or republican-lite who is happy to work with republicans wins.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago

Establishment ratfuckers and the ratchet effect - name a more iconic duo.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

too bad people wont wake up from that, if it stays the same, maybe a couple of cyle of republican elections, would finally wake people up, because republicans always made sure the ticking time bombs that set in place is always the blame of the dems

[-] piefood@feddit.online 4 points 1 day ago

Then maybe the Dems should stop building the bombs, and handing them to the Republicans.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
814 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

9280 readers
1820 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS