812
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
812 points (100.0% liked)
Progressive Politics
3419 readers
154 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Democratic Party leadership is elected. There’s nothing stopping people from getting elected to the party and forcing change.
My take on this is that the left of the mainstream left does not like building institutions or changing them. Or their ideas are just not popular amongst the people who are politically engaged. Like I don’t think a true democratic socialist could get elected as a state party chair in any US state. If they wanted to do so they would have to build a movement similar to what conservatives did with the tea party and grow the actively engaged base of the party. Instead people just complain online and do nothing.
They ran out the vice chair of the dnc as soon as they started doing that lol
You're ignoring the role of Super PACs, which would crush even people running for DNC leadership.
If you wanted to there is a high probably you could get elected to your local democratic committee. A lot of the times they’re uncontested or are a very small constituency you can easily canvass.
There is nothing stopping you from registering as a democrat, knocking on all of your neighbors doors, asking them to consider registering as democrats and then asking them to vote for you.
I personally just don’t think these ideas are popular outside of certain pockets. If you want to change that you need to do the work…
Superpac money wont help much in a race with like 200 or even 2000 voters. If you’re willing to put the time in you can get into these positions.
My opinion that there is zero chance that would ever happen in my case aside - in very unimpactful positions, of course, individuals have a chance and it's fair for you to point out.
These positions are impactful. Because they elect the county democratic committees (if your state Democratic Party is organized at the municipal level) or the county committees usually elect the state level committees (with some exceptions). The state committees then elect the national officers/ DNC reps.
I appreciate your responses and perspective - I truly hope somebody finds it useful.
I would sooner run for other forms of leadership in my community, as I have lost confidence that organizing around the Democratic Party will translate to concrete change.
However, I don't wish to diminish or discourage well-intentioned action, any and all action is appreciated in my book - regardless of how I might personally view the situation.
Lol
I don't understand how you people think. You want people to collectively organize, come to unified working class populist thought, but once you do that, you can get all those people to vote for a 3rd party candidate.
Ok
Yes, everyone who disagrees with you is paid to do so.
Prove that I'm "repeating Russian propaganda", and then prove that "people who repeat Russian propaganda tend to be either Russian or paid bots."
Because both of those claims are bullshit.
You're denying the claim that Russia helped Trump get elected and are spreading fascism throughout the world via the internet.
I'm not sure how to prove that? But like I said, Trump supporters repeat a lot of Russian propaganda. Marxists, too. It's sad really.
Which one are you?
Prove that denying that claim is "Russian Propaganda"
Then you shouldn't have made the claim then, should you?
Prove it.
Lol, you really are a Nazi. But seriously, prove it.
Why did me saying "Marxists often repeat Russian propaganda" make you call me a "Nazi"?
Lol, still waiting on your actual evidence for any of those claims, Nazi.
Is that all you do is just say "that's not evidence", misuse logical fallacies while engaging in them yourself, and call people names?
Don't they teach you how to actually argue a point?
Wow, look at that, you still can't province actual evidence, so you're going to have a cry and being asked.
Do you think making baseless assertions and then crying when asked to prove them is "actually arguing a point"?
Isn't that what you're doing?
Making baseless assertions like calling me a nazi? Crying "Nazi" in every single reply to me?
No, I'm not the one claiming that the Ruskies and the inscrutable orientals are poluting our precious bodily fluids. That's you.
Baseless? The basis is that you're engaging in Nazi conspiracy theory.
Ah, so you're a racist too. That makes sense, you were projecting with all the "Nazi" claims, weren't you?
Meaning the conspiracy that you're a Nazi?
Lol. I see you're back to feigning illiteracy.
That’s not how it works. If Russia and I both say the sky is blue, that’s hardly proof that my opinion is tied to Russia in any way.
Saying the sky is blue doesn't benefit Russia though, does it?
Whether it benefits Russia or not doesn’t factor in at all to whether my opinion is linked to Russia’s.
It should, considering Russia is trying to spread fascism throughout the world.
I suggest further honing your logical reasoning / critical thinking skills.
Have you ever heard the news of what happened to David Hogg? There is plenty stopping people from getting elected and making changes. Like a sudden revote to make sure he loses his seat he fought to win.
Except for, ya know, the Democratic leadership, demonstrably.