1050

A video recorded last week has ignited outrage online after it captured ICE agents violently arresting two brothers in South Norwalk, Connecticut, in broad daylight without producing a warrant. The men, identified as Ricardo Chavez and his brother, reportedly hold legal status to live and work in the United States.

The footage (credit @alwaysfilmthepolice) shows plainclothes ICE agents forcibly detaining the men in a public area. Witnesses say the agents refused to provide identification or present a warrant when asked, instead resorting to physical force and a taser to subdue the brothers before hauling them away. They also allegedly damaged their vehicle.

Community members who know the Chavez family insist that both men are law-abiding residents with valid documentation. “They work, they pay taxes, and they belong here,” said one South Norwalk resident who witnessed the arrest. “This was nothing short of a kidnapping.”

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250820120402/https://thenerdstash.com/masked-ice-agents-smash-car-beat-and-arrest-local-father-without-warrant-in-connecticut-another-day-in-dystopian-hell/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Dehumanizing one's enemies is what Nazis do.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Cops are taking people to concentration camps which will certainly become death camps or slavery in time

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I agree that they're bad people. I do not agree that they aren't people.

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Oh fuck off. People are pissed off and rightly so, don’t impose your bloated sense of morality on them and try to villainize the people being put under the boot of fascists for viewing those fascists as inhuman monsters when they are acting like inhuman monsters. Asking people to humanize victims is fine, but demanding that people humanize those that terrorize them is just moral masturbation. Shut the hell up.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh fuck off.

No.

don’t impose your bloated sense of morality on them

My sense of morality is the reason I'm not a Nazi and don't act like a Nazi.

for viewing those fascists as inhuman monsters

You know what, you're right. We should just shrug, throw our hands up, and declare "guess they're just evil subhuman scum!" instead of looking at the problem objectively and dealing with the societal issues that lead human beings into these kinds of ideologies. I bet that'll work this time.

demanding that people humanize those that terrorize them is just moral masturbation

Bullshit. They are human beings. They have some really bad beliefs and it's ok to dislike them. You're already justified. You don't need the hyperbolus bullshit. You don't need to talk exactly like they do to make your point.

Fuck fascists. They are subhuman scum because they are actively choosing to be subhuman scum. They forfeit their right to be regarded as a person and became part of a system of hate. It’s not an innate trait of who they are, and I’m not giving them the benefit of empathy when they are making the choice of viewing real people as targets out of pure hatred of them being a different skin color or speaking a different language or being born on a different piece of land. Nazis and fascists gave up their humanity by choice, not by nature. You’re begging sympathy for the devil to appease your ego to feel holier than thou. Fuck your soap box.

[-] prole 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yep. Which is why they need to be dehumanized. There is a difference when it's targeting one specific group because of their murderous hatred. They need to be stopped.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

You can stop them without using their rhetoric.

[-] prole 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

History has shown us that there is only one way to stop them. I guess people like you need to learn the hard way again, rather than learn from history.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

How exactly is saying "they're not human" on the internet going to stop them?

[-] prole 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Read a history book, then maybe you'll understand what I was referring to.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I've read a few, but none of them said that we defeated Hitler by calling him subhuman on the internet.

[-] prole 1 points 1 day ago
[-] flandish@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

again with this? tolerating the intolerant is not possible. in addition, I did not dehumanize them. they do it to themselves.

why do you support nazis?

[-] EldritchFeminity 9 points 2 days ago

It's not about tolerating the intolerant, it's about not using their same thought process lest you fall prey to the same kinds of propaganda. Besides, removing their humanity absolves them of their sin. This isn't like a house cat killing birds on instinct, these people choose to do this. And they should be treated accordingly.

Broke: Nazis aren't human

Woke: The worst monsters to be born on this planet are all human, and they all seem to really like swastikas

[-] prole 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

it’s about not using their same thought process

It's not even close to the same thought process though. You have to know that, right?

removing their humanity absolves them of their sin.

Also, I take issue with the entire concept of "sin," so that argument holds no water for me. I mean, what a meaningless "argument". How does it absolve them of anything??

[-] EldritchFeminity 2 points 1 day ago

It absolutely is. It's a thought process people use to make their actions easier to justify to their own sense of morality and empathy. Militaries drill that same thought process into soldiers for the same reason. It's much easier to shoot something than it is to shoot somebody, so your enemy must be less than human to make pulling the trigger easier. So you turn a group of people into the Other. And the more you do it, the easier it gets, and all it takes is somebody convincing you that the wrong group deserves the same treatment.

"My enemy isn't human. My enemy is less than human. Since the dawning of Mankind, this has been the battlecry."

Also, I take issue with the entire concept of "sin," so that argument holds no water for me. I mean, what a meaningless "argument". How does it absolve them of anything??

I don't care one way or another about the theology around the word "sin," but it's the perfect word to describe their actions. By reducing them to subhuman, you make it easy to remove their free will in the equation - it becomes the "just following orders" excuse - and it's incredibly important to remember that they chose to do this. Nobody is born hateful, hatred is learned. They made the conscious choice to be hateful and act this way, and they should be held accountable for that choice.

People have a hard time accepting that the worst people this planet has ever seen are as human as you and me, but to deny it is to turn a blind eye to the fact that the people in that video could be our neighbors, friends, or family. Because we know them, and they're good people, so they'd never do something like that, right?

[-] prole 1 points 1 day ago

I know full well that they are human, and that any human is capable of vile things... I'm not literally dehumanizing people in that I literally see them as subhuman.

I just have a special category on human for fascists that deserve nothing but pain and death because that's what they are intent on inflicting on the world. They need to be stopped before they literally murder millions of innocent people.

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

fair and cogent reply. i’ll take it. :)

[-] Soulg@ani.social 1 points 2 days ago

Much more well put than I could do myself.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

"They are no longer human" doesn't count as dehumanizing? Is english not your first language?

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Those seeking to destroy humanity are not worthy of our humanity.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Are you saying that to defeat Nazis we must become Nazis?

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

If that’s how your spongy brain wants to see it, sure. By that logic, all of the WWII veterans are actually Nazis.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

WW2 veterans didn't dehumanize people, wtf are you talking about?

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

They just shot them and turned them into hamburger

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

They treated them as enemies, not non-humans. Its an important distinction. Its the reason they were the good guys and you're not.

[-] prole 5 points 2 days ago

What do you think a Nazi actually is? Because it isn't "stop fascists from killing other people."

Why do you keep equating these two things? It's weird.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Why are you using Nazi tactics when you supposedly want to stop Nazis?

[-] prole 4 points 2 days ago

What "Nazi tactics" am I using, specifically? I would love to know.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago
[-] prole 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Equating what I'm saying to Nazi dehumanization is extremely disingenuous. One is about trying to prevent mass murder based on bigotry, and the other is about perpetrating it. But nuance is hard I guess.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
1050 points (100.0% liked)

News

31764 readers
2704 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS