172
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by icegladiator@lemy.lol to c/news@lemmy.world

A new study published in the journal Sexuality & Culture has found that many adolescents in Spain, including those as young as 12, are not only aware of OnlyFans but also see it as a viable and even empowering way to make money. In group discussions with over 160 teenagers, researchers discovered that platforms promoting erotic content are influencing how young people—especially girls—view economic opportunity, self-worth, and sexuality. Teens frequently framed content creation as a personal choice or expression of agency, while minimizing the risks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] poofkaboom@feddit.nl 2 points 17 hours ago

Now I want the woke crowd to defend mainstreamification of sex work.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 5 points 10 hours ago

Now I want the unwoke crowd to defend mainstreaming of child labor...

[-] farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago

sex work is work no different than other jobs other than puritanical stigma against it

[-] poofkaboom@feddit.nl 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I don’t agree. I have a simple test which anyone cam do. Ask yourself- Would I promote my child (obviously once they become legal age) to do xyz?

[-] farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

gotta have money to live they should do whatever they want to make money as long as it isn't harming anyone.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Would you promote your child to work for ICE?

There are lots and lots of jobs lower on the ladder than OnlyFans. If your litmus test is "Well, I wouldn't want MY child doing it..." then it's all down to personal morals not an actual inherent problem with the job.

I'm not thrilled that my kid is out there creating AIs. I don't mean prompt engineering, I mean as in "he's a leader in the AI space, writing papers, speaking at conferences" kind of thing.

But he's safe, happy, seeing the world, and making a fuck ton of money so...

[-] JonsJava@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Rather than banning, I'll just explain why I think you're a troll or an idiot.

If you're not rich you're selling your body.

Coal miners? Longshoreman? Farmers? Hell, sitting at a desk all day.

They all sell their body.

The only difference is you assume that it's shameful if it's sexual, or your trolling.

[-] poofkaboom@feddit.nl 3 points 11 hours ago

You know what, fuck it. Ban me. I don't think I have broken any rules.

[-] blackstampede@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Upvote to bring you back to zero, because why not. I thought your other comment was a reasonable question, even if I don't agree, and nothing I've seen from you so far seems ban-worthy (although obviously, the mods might disagree with me).

To respond to your question - I wouldn't promote my kid doing anything, really. I might put them in touch with experts, give them an education, or introduce them to useful people, but I can't imagine any profession that my child could get into where I would go out of my way to "promote" their work.

If they were of legal age and decided to get into porn or sex work, I'd advise being careful (especially for in-person work) and I obviously wouldn't be consuming any of their content, but other than that, I'd let them make their own decisions. I don't let my kid play sports that are going to permanently impact their mental function, and I wouldn't advise professional wrestling or football as a career choice, but if they decided that that was what they wanted to do with their life, that's up to them.

I don't see how porn is worse.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago

Ask yourself- Would I promote my child (obviously once they become legal age) to do xyz?

I would not promote my child, once of any age, legal or otherwise, to be a:

  • Cop
  • Coal miner
  • Road crew worker
  • Soldier
  • Hedge Fund Manager
  • Debt collections specialist

And a host of other jobs. So, those jobs are basically on par with sex work, correct?

[-] magic_smoke 6 points 12 hours ago

Sex work is exploitative not because its sexual, but because its work under capitalism.

[-] poofkaboom@feddit.nl 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Would it be not exploitative otherwise, how?

[-] magic_smoke 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Under a properly implemented socialist system, it just wouldn't have a reason to exist, and people would continue having sex the normal, non-exploitative way.

Unless that's your fucking kink or something, but that's pretty niche and usually controlled between known parties.

[-] prole 4 points 11 hours ago

Who fucking cares what you want. Go away troll.

[-] poofkaboom@feddit.nl 1 points 11 hours ago
[-] prole 4 points 10 hours ago

Brand new account comes in and demands "woke people" defend something for your amusement?

[-] NochMehrG@feddit.org 18 points 17 hours ago

As part of the woke crowd, what I want to see is the „mainstreamification“ of respect for and safety of the people in sex work. You know, because they’re people.

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
172 points (100.0% liked)

News

31697 readers
2380 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS