182
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 23 points 3 days ago

Cool. How walkable and transit-able is Denver?

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago
[-] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago
[-] relativestranger@feddit.nl 17 points 3 days ago

well, there is transit in denver. rtd has a typical (for the u.s.) bus service, along with 10 rail lines (mix of heavy and light rail), serving over 60m passenger rides a year. however, many parts of the city have little or no service at all.

[-] PacMan@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, nearest light rail station is 2 miles away from me and I live in the city. I can ride my bike around town for the most part, beating people driving if we start at the same start and going to the same destination. I do ride mostly in late spring -early fall. Snow and ice make it hard for my gravel bike to get around. But getting from the south side of town to the north side kind of is a bear riding. Lot of bus stops in my area though……

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I have a remote job and considered moving there. I ultimately decided not to because of the cost of living and the low walkability of the city.

[-] PacMan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

You must live in a very walkable city then. I find Denver to be excellent but I spent a lot of time in Ohio before Denver and those cities suck for walkablity and bike ability

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I live in a city where I can afford to actually live in a very walkable part.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Lite Rail is finally making it down Colfax! Lol we need to shout down all the NIMBYs. We need housing and transit yesterday. But money prevents human development at this point.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Some parts near downtown and a few hipster areas are walkable. The rest of the city is not at all walkable.

There is some mass transit in Denver that works pretty well for specific areas. If you are not in those areas then there is very little access to mass transit.

[-] BussyCat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

This is where capitalism actually works. If an apartment building is able to save 1m on construction costs because they have less parking they will then have reduced demand from people who own cars so will have to lower price. If the amount that they save on construction causes them to lose money because people value those parking spaces greater than the cost to build them then the construction companies will be forced to build more spaces.

But by first removing the parking minimums it allows housing to be built denser and near transit lines so the city will become more walkable and transit able.

It’s never a bad idea to build transit first but it’s hard to get people to actually use transit when everything is so far apart from eachother that causes people to half to walk 10-20 minutes from the bus stops to their destination

[-] keyez@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Like others have mentioned it could be better but I moved to the south east recently and these are actually unwalkable cities I had no idea. At least in Denver there's sidewalks 85% of the time and a regular bus or train available to get some places.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
182 points (100.0% liked)

News

31486 readers
2996 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS