15

But one word signals it’s more than just that — Omar’s mention of “defensive” capabilities also serves as a pointed critique of one of her closest colleagues and ideological allies in the House: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheFogan@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago

No disagreement there. But in general the key point is pointing out the meaninglessness of the claim that you are only supporting one aspect and not supporting other parts.

Further analogies... say a family member is a drug addict. You don't want to support their drug addiction, but you do want to help them... so you buy their groceries. (Ignoring the possibility that they resell or barter your groceries for drugs), even then the problem is still obvious... you've saved them the money they would have had to spend on food... and while not using the money you gave them, they could still apply the money they saved, into buying drugs.

Key point, yes 100% agreed with you, isreals actions means they deserve no support at all right now, without a major change to government, huge change in their public actions. If there is a country in the middle east that actually needs a regime change war... that's the one.

But on top of that, the idea that you can support a country only doing what you don't disagree with, without supporting their evil actions otherwise, is really nonsense.

[-] thedruid@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

"But on top of that, the idea that you can support a country only doing what you don't disagree with, without supporting their evil actions otherwise, is really nonsense.'

Your wording is a bit unwieldy ( no insult, mine is often way worse), but I believe your saying that it isn't possible to support a country's noble intents without supporting it's evil?

Yes it is.

Support I. The sense that we do not have to do a damn thing with them at all if they don't stop their shit. We can

Now am I naive and believing that the countries we support don't do evil shit? No. Not at all. And honestly if fucking GENOCIDE wasnt what was being engaged in, yeah I can see working deals and such.

This isn't the time for such bullshit. There isn't ENOUGH time. The Palestinians will be gone if we keep playing these fucking games.

I appreciate your civil discourse btw, be assured that any harshness isn't directed at you personally.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25002 readers
2379 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS