452
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] shapis@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

This very nice Romanian lady that taught me complex plane calculus made sure to emphasize that e^j*theta was just a notation.

Then proceeded to just use it as if it was actually eulers number to the j arg. And I still don’t understand why and under what cases I can’t just assume it’s the actual thing.

[-] frezik 10 points 1 month ago

Let's face it: Calculus notation is a mess. We have three different ways to notate a derivative, and they all suck.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Calculus was the only class I failed in college. It was one of those massive 200 student classes. The teacher had a thick accent and hand writing that was difficult to read. Also, I remember her using phrases like "iff" that at the time I thought was her misspelling something only to later realize it was short hand for "if and only if", so I can't imagine how many other things just blew over my head.

I retook it in a much smaller class and had a much better time.

[-] zea_64 6 points 1 month ago

I've seen e^{d/dx}

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

e^𝘪θ^ is not just notation. You can graph the entire function e^x+𝘪θ^ across the whole complex domain and find that it matches up smoothly with both the version restricted to the real axis (e^x^) and the imaginary axis (e^𝘪θ^). The complete version is:

e^x+𝘪θ^ := e^x^(cos(θ) + 𝘪sin(θ))

Various proofs of this can be found on wikipeda. Since these proofs just use basic calculus, this means we didn't need to invent any new notation along the way.

[-] shapis@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I'm aware of that identity. There's a good chance I misunderstood what she said about it being just a notation.

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

It's not simply notation, since you can prove the identity from base principles. An alien species would be able to discover this independently.

[-] sabin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It legitimately IS exponentiation. Romanian lady was wrong.

[-] carmo55@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

It is just a definition, but it's the only definition of the complex exponential function which is well behaved and is equal to the real variable function on the real line.

Also, every identity about analytical functions on the real line also holds for the respective complex function (excluding things that require ordering). They should have probably explained it.

[-] shapis@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

She did. She spent a whole class on about the fundamental theorem of algebra I believe? I was distracted though.

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
452 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16103 readers
2786 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS