168
submitted 3 weeks ago by Noerknhar@feddit.org to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

If I can read books and learn, why can't AI?

[-] monogram@feddit.nl 33 points 3 weeks ago

Just because you own a cd doesn’t mean you have a license to play it in a club.

[-] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's a good thing they are not playing at a club then.

[-] jmill@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 weeks ago

In this analogy, the AI uses books like a remix DJ would use bits and pieces of songs from different tracks to splice together their output. Except in the case of AI, it will be much harder to identify the original source.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 weeks ago

Under this definition, it is illegal summarize news articles behind a paywall.

[-] jmill@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

If you made money doing that, it probably would be illegal. You would certainly get sued, in any case.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 weeks ago

People make a lot of money summarizing articles behind paywalls and it is generally considered legal as long as it is a summary and not copied text.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago
[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 weeks ago

You don't have to pay for fair use.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

So how are they making a lot of money then?

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 weeks ago

Advertisement. You don't have to pay for original content. You just need to pay someone/thing to summarize it and get clicks for advertisement.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I can't say I've ever seen this in my life. Paid advertisement on summaries of paywalled articles. Not something I've come across. Certainly they would be sued if they were found by the companies in question I imagine.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sure you have. If you ever have read an article that says "As reported in X", that is a summarization of another journalist's work.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well now I don't think you understand what a summarization is.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 weeks ago

I was thinking the same about you.

[-] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Since when can't you use knowledge gained from books for personal profit?

The only difference is scale.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 17 points 3 weeks ago

...because you are a person, not a product.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

LLMs (currently colloquially "AI") are literally incapable of "learning."

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 3 weeks ago

LLMs are not sentient and never can be.

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
168 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

3528 readers
322 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS