757
submitted 9 months ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

I genuinely don't believe I've moved the goalposts, especially as I didn't argue anyone new in my last post.

Would you be able to explain to me how I moved them so I can better understand what you're seeing?

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago

I can see that you’re attempting to be “neutral” but you’re using the same talking points in this thread as the corpo dems and media…

I’m not mad or upset with you or anything I promise

[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

I’m not mad or upset with you or anything I promise

O. K. That's fair enough; "talking out of your ass" and "kiss copirate dems asses" felt more angry than anything but maybe that's just because "ass" was being used.

I feel like the points I've mentioned I've gotten the reasoning for more from political scientists (as I don't really care about the positions of the media or the corporate Dem.s) but it was never my intent to convince anyone of them; I was trying to explain why, if the Dem.s did back Cuomo, it wouldn't address the reasoning of someone who believes not voting third party in a presidential election (an attempt to understand the building blocks of that person's PoV, even if one thinks that PoV is garbage). It may just be how my brain works but understanding the mechanics of someone's reasoning, even if one would never agree with the conclusion, I find beneficial. Potentially because it helps to break apart their argument in a way they'd understand (though, of course, it can be hard to convince some people to change their minds).

But it's definitely not the most important thing here, in the end. The progressive (and exceedingly) better candidate won the nomination; (since I think that's something we both agree on wanting to have happened) I'm entirely much more enthusiastic about that outcome than anything else discussed in the thread.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

Totally, I get a little animated and excited…

Yes I’m happy he won, I just hear the way they are treating him on the news and it’s a huge reminder that AIPAC is a detriment to our society, and we need to overturn citizens united very badly.

[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah…; I absolutely get that (and share the sentiment). I don't want to speak too quickly (though, from everything I've seen, his odds look good‽) but I will definitely relish their reactions when he wins. It's about time NYC gets a decent mayor.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sigh….. the part that pisses me off the most is that we lose so often… even though we have supermajorities of support on basically all of the major policy issues among both democrats AND republicans…..

Instead the media is always talking about bathrooms and sports and other really weird wedge issues… don’t read this the wrong way, lgbtq rights are super important, they are human rights 100%, but these issues affect only a small percent of the population,

whereas the economic policy issues that would solve so much of the underlying fear and hatred are just completely glossed over, even though every year multiple times a year another economic study indicates that neoliberal policy and general economic theory is just fundamentally wrong…..

I just hope the that this recent Gaza fucking genocide is waking folks up to the fact that our media, our politicians, our leaders, all of them are corrupt trash that need to be thrown out and cast aside, mocked even…

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
757 points (100.0% liked)

News

37166 readers
1995 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS