860

"We are very proud of this! We are nobodies, we have no money, nothing!" Tommaso Cacciari, from a group calling itself No Space for Bezos, told the BBC.

"We're just citizens who started organising and we managed to move one of the most powerful people in the world - all the billionaires - out of the city."

The wedding kicks off later this week, and has a star-studded guest list of the rich and famous that is rumoured to include Kim Kardashian, Mick Jagger and Leonardo diCaprio, as well as several of the Trumps.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zqps@sh.itjust.works 71 points 4 days ago

Nothing was ever actually built by people like Bezos.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

Nothing was ever built by a person on a computer.

Don't diminish his work. If you want billionaires to have less influence you have to replace what they do. If you think they do nothing then you have nothing to understand.

Of all places, Venice is in the top 5 of places that cannot complain about being commercialized and rented out. Simping for Venice just shows how big the hate for Bezos is which isn't justified when looking at the criticism:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Bezos

Where does the hate come from? He shows the limits of worker organized structures in comparison. All the unemployed could have built Amazon by themselves. The focus should be placed on finding new forms of cooperation, not on hating Bezos.

[-] Nelots@lemmy.zip 30 points 4 days ago

Where does the hate come from?

He hordes more wealth than almost anyone else in the entire world. The man could fucking cure cancer and I would still hate him and consider him a horrible person. Nobody needs or deserves that much money when so much of the word is struggling to get by. And nobody makes that much money without exploiting others.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

He owns shares of Amazon, not money. If he sells those he loses his influence.

People are struggling because markets are distorted, including preventing free global movement of people. Figure out who does that before hating Bezos.

[-] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 15 points 4 days ago

And that shows you don't understand the power of "just owning shares". It's a whole fucking shit load better than having income or money. He can take whatever loan he wants with his stocks as collateral. He skips out completely on doing anything helpful to society whatsoever. People are struggling because of this system, yes, and people like Bezos are happily living grand off of it

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

Of course. But Bezos taking loans is only slightly connected to keeping people poor. As far as I know Bezos also hasn't financed a regime change for some mining operations.

Other corporations depend much more on keeping people poor. They don't get the attention because they are not household names. It's not good that richness has become the measure for evil, and not evil itself.

[-] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 10 points 4 days ago

Look up "criticism of Amazon" or anything like that and you'll see he isn't just a good guy who happened to make a big benevolent corporation. From antitrust practices, to design theft, especially from POC, counterfeit products, special tax deals designed to contribute as little as possible, a significantly negative effect on the environment and more. Add to that Bezos' personal relationships with business and government leaders that are actively trying to keep people poor, including Trump. It's not the good-guy corporation you think it is.

And yes, when you're worth 220 billion dollars and you do nothing positive with it whatsoever, you're problematic, bordering on evil. It's greed. If Bezos gave a flying shit about humanity, imagine what kind of change he could actually do.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

It’s not the good-guy corporation you think it is.

Of course. As the saying goes, there are no innocent billionaires.

If Bezos gave a flying shit about humanity, imagine what kind of change he could actually do.

Yes, that would be nice. But it totally shifts the blame away from regular people. We live in a democracy. This entire debate could have been spent on how to improve the world. If we don't have the money, why don't we come up with a plan and ask Bezos for the money if needed? Actually there are so much taxes that society can easily outspend Bezos.

[-] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 7 points 4 days ago

So you do recognise that. Then why are you spending so much energy defending Bezos and people like him?

Sure, regular people should rise up and retake power. Take back resources from the billionaires. Idk who "we" are - but I don't live in USA, and if I did I wouldn't be living in a democracy. There are plenty of plans for how to save the planet and they all include stopping billionaires and fundamentally changing the system. Think Bezos will bankroll it if we ask him nicely?

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

Because this is backwards. Billionaires fill the void that people don't fill. The system could be changed right now if people stopped focussing on billionaires and would create their own structures.

Yes, people are kept stupid. But believing that all it takes is getting rid of billionaires is part of the disinformation.

[-] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 5 points 4 days ago

What structures are people supposed to create exactly?

I never claimed it was the entire problem and that it solve all of humanity's issues, but the system that they've helped create and now benefit from is what's destroying both the world and humanity. Eating just a few of them wouldn't change that but it'd be a start. That's why the fact that a few hundreds of brave Venetians won't let him do whatever he wants in their home is awesome. Entitled motherfuckers coming in their private planes and yachts acting like they own a city that's literally sinking and where locals can hardly make a living.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

What structures are people supposed to create exactly?

That's to be determined. I don't know how people want to live.

What Bezos has done for Amazon, which is ignored as he "doesn't work", has to be replaced. People have to be organized. The structure can be anything that works, but it has to be something.

Same for all the other billionaires that people don't want to see in power.

Entitled motherfuckers coming in their private planes and yachts acting like they own a city that’s literally sinking and where locals can hardly make a living.

Haven't locals already been replaced by millionaires and moved to Mestre? I don't want to root for millionaires who feel diminished by billionaires.

[-] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 1 points 3 days ago

What is it you think Bezos does and has done "for Amazon" that makes him so important? The main thing he was good at was knowing how to rig the system. If he died tomorrow you'll see that Amazon will do just as fine, possibly even better. He's not even the CEO anymore. People can't just "create structures" when all the world's resources are owned by regimes and big corporations. If I create my own Amazon-equivalent they're gonna destroy me before I ever make it big.

The Old City is being heavily depopulated, yes. Locals can hardly even live their anymore. So why wouldn't thry be angry?

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

If I create my own Amazon-equivalent they’re gonna destroy me before I ever make it big

Start an AWS in Europe now. You should even get government support.

What is it you think Bezos does and has done “for Amazon” that makes him so important? T

Have you seen my great man comments? Nothing in particular. But if people want to do without billionaires, they have to do "it" by themselves.

Locals can hardly even live their anymore. So why wouldn’t thry be angry?

Are they? "Pay more tax" sounds like a demand from American expats. More irony if they are defending Venice from Bezos.

[-] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 1 points 3 days ago

There's plenty of Cloud companies in the works currently; I already applied for a position at Evroc. But it's not all that Amazon does.

Run corporations by ourselves? Gladly! When do the CEOs step down?

Definitely Italian names and groups being mentioned in the article. Might be some Americans and others inbetween; it's a struggle mirrored around the world. Can just be a reference to the fact that Bezos and Amazon are known tax evaders - including for their EU business. And yes, I'd imagine that people aren't happy about being priced out of their own communities - hence the widespread anti-tourism protests in general

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

Run corporations by ourselves? Gladly! When do the CEOs step down?

How come it's either civil war or nothing for most lefties? Why are people willing to fight a civil war and believe in success but not willing to start a business? The probability for survival is much bigger.

[-] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 1 points 3 days ago

That might be a genuine option if not for widespread antitrust abuses by what is essentially monopolies.. your answer to that is "just create more businesses"?

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's always duopolies because the elite doesn't trust itself. This leaves some room for business.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

He owns shares of Amazon, not money.

Awww poor Jeff

[-] zqps@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

His work, his sole accomplishment, is maximizing value extraction. That's not nothing, it's less than nothing because it's a monumental net negative for the rest of society.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

Maximizing value extraction is not bad as long as there is a free market. That's what drives competition and brings prices down. Of course, employees and customers need other options for this to be fair.

Unless you organize a cooperating economy, maximizing value extraction is inevitable.

Besides, you shouldn't ignore the work he does.

[-] prole 1 points 3 days ago

Maximizing value extraction is not bad as long as there is a free market.

Yes it is. It is inherently exploitative.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

How is it exploitative? If you get market rates for your work or pay market rates for the stuff you buy, you don't lose in transactions.

Those who maximize value extraction optimize resource allocation and bring prices down for everybody.

[-] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 days ago

Lemmy, the software you're using right now, was built by a person on a computer. As was the operating system your computer uses to function.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

As was the management structure, leadership culture and selection of markets by Bezos.

People on computers work, but so do CEOs.

[-] Darkblue@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Don't diminish his work? The world could easily do with Amazon, or with an alternative/competitors/etc.

So Bezos himself is irrelevant in the discussion about important leaders. He wishes he was in that group.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 3 points 3 days ago

You simping this hard for Bezos for free is the really sad part.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

To me, the sad part is that I am not simping, but nobody recognizes that. Like a bull in a bullfight, people attack billionaires without seeing the dagger.

Especially Amazon, people could have recognized the idea and created a cooperative competitor. Bezos is a billionaire because they haven't.

There are four options for the billionaire situation. Do nothing, organize a new party, civil war or starting competing businesses.

Hating Bezos without understanding his skills looks like the first option to me. In a world of flooding zones, that makes me wary.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 5 points 3 days ago

People like Bezos actively prevents competitors from emerging. You equating someone who received $245,000 from his parents with any random guy who could have done the same is culpably dense. His skills are being the business equivalent of a cancer that kills its host in order to grow.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

And yet, what other options exist right now?

But starting another regular company would end up with yet another billionaire, if successful. To avoid billionaires, businesses have to be structured and financed differently anyway.

[-] prole 1 points 3 days ago
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
860 points (100.0% liked)

World News

47893 readers
2253 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS