511
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by outrageousmatter@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

“Vorpious de liporius octo”, the coverup is worse than the crime.

Let’s hope if the crime isn’t enough that his attempts to cover it up are what takes him down.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Republicans didn't learn a damn thing from Watergate.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Wrong!

They learned they'd never let one of their criminals face punishment ever again. As a result they created FOX News in order to always be able to control the narrative and always muddy the waters.

It has worked brilliantly for them so far. And the only cost has been a complete erosion in the trust of news, complete erosion in civil discourse complete erosion in bi partisanship.

They have taken a metal pipe to democracy's kneecaps just to make sure their criminals never have to pay any real consequences.

All of this btw is fully documented. I'm sad to say say, but some brilliant minds put a lot of work into establishing and creating fox news.. It's very sad.

It's kind of like today we have brilliant engineers spending their time fighting ad blockers and shoving ads down people's throats.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Fox Entertainment.

Remember, they're not a news source so let's remind everyone of that every time we mention them.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

How did that work out? Stay tuned

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They learned they can get away with it.

Because, IIRC, Nixon didn't die in jail...

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

they absolutely learned from watergate. they got everything they wanted from trump. hell, with what they learned from watergate they got away with selling crack to fund right-wing death squads on behalf of coca cola.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I don't know if that fits. He was showing off war plans. That could have had dire consequences.

[-] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Totally fair, I’m not trying to downplay what he initially did, I just think focusing on the coverup aspect is, in some ways, more effective. They can convince their followers that what he did wasn’t actually wrong (even if it absolutely was) but it’s harder to explain trying to cover up something that “wasn’t wrong”.

[-] shuzuko@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

You would think so, but their explanation will just be "he covered it up because he knew the libs would act like this".

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know that the coverup is "worse" ... but its often easier to charge and prove

[-] DarienGS@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That'd be Latin, still used in legal contexts.

[-] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] DarienGS@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If someone told you that then I'm afraid I think they were pulling your leg. The phrase might be translated into Latin as something like "deceptio peius sceleris"... what you wrote means "[made-up word] of [made-up word] eight".

[-] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Hmm it appears you are right, I don’t know when that got logged in my brain at “Latin” but for some reason I thought it was. Googling some I can’t find a good origin for that even though it’s often used online as “the coverup is worse than the crime”.

There are websites like this that say it’s Latin but Google translate doesn’t give the same results so I guess it’s wrong?

https://mymemory.translated.net/en/Latin/English/vorpius-de-liporius-octo

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
511 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3417 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS