198
submitted 1 year ago by luthis@lemmy.nz to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] eusousuperior@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Some crimes are so heinous and intrinsically evil that I believe we as society shouldn't take the burden of keeping those people alive just for the sake of it. I believe that in those very limited cases, death penalty should be allowed.

[-] pgetsos@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago

The problem is that you will 100% kill innocent people. And there is no way to reverse it later on...

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The state always hurts innocent people regardless, so ultimately better to just kill them than to subject them to the horrors of prison and act like that's okay simply because they're alive.

Personally, it's a sacrifice I'm willing to make and I unironically would feel safer from my own government knowing the worst that'll happen is a mere hanging compared to the enslavement, torture and rape, for decades, flung onto innocents in the name of being humane.

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

and if it was you who was being executed for something you didn't do?

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I would be grateful it was only a noose and not decades of rape, torture, and enslavement. That's literally why I believe it. Specifically because I don't want to be falsely imprisoned, and if you actually empathized, you'd feel the same way.

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

something like 5% of american executions are of innocent people. Disgusting. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/innocence/innocence-by-the-numbers

[-] NotAPenguin@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

If it's allowed there will be mistakes, innocent people will be killed.

And it will be abused.

[-] eusousuperior@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This should only be used for cases where there is 100% of evidence that the person is guilty (eg: tool box killers, Breivik, mass murderers, etc)

[-] blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Except Singapore has used it plenty of times with flimsy evidence.

[-] wabafee@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I agree death penality itself has its uses e.g. prosecution of war criminals, rebel leaders, druglords and I think corrupt officials in some cases. It should be applied to those who despite being behind bars would continue to influence outside causing more death or downfall of a nation if they remain alive. Though for this case just for carrying heroine I don't think that should be a death sentence it is just stupid an outdated way of control. Though problem with death sentence sometimes it becomes a hammer and when it becomes a hammer everything becomes a nail. It should only be a last resort.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
198 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38591 readers
1652 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS