381
Cory Booker Ripped After Voting to Confirm Ivanka’s Father-in-Law
(www.thedailybeast.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
381 points (100.0% liked)
politics
23571 readers
2921 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
His sincerity has been lacking for awhile now. This kind of puts the final nail in. There is no reason in the world that would be okay that he approved this guy, other than he hit the wrong button by mistake.
He was always in big pharms pocket. He just did a good job at tricking people who didn't follow him closely because he makes himself very seen and vocal at rallies and protests that aren't against people who line his pockets.
Big pharma is tied to 6% of all the jobs in NJ the state he represents. Why wouldnt he represent the interests of his electorate?
That's not representing the people, that's representing the corporations that are bribing(?), extorting(?) him to vote that way.
No, that is representing the people. Believe it or not but the people who work for big Pharma tend to want their companies to continue to exist and fir their work to continue.
Do you really need me to explain to you why an industry that employs 1 in 20 people might be important to the state overall? Do you not get how connected you are economically to others in your state?
So what you're telling me is, it's okay to sacrifice the rest of the country for your own state. Let's also know for a fact that pharma would pick up and leave if it was feasibly possible because it was cheaper, no matter how he votes.
You might be surprised to find out Senators only represent their state and not the nation as a whole.
Pharma requires a ton of infrastructure there isn’t another place for it to move to.
So I understand you likely are against any universal healthcare in our country? Because of jobs?
There's always more healthcare staff needed everywhere, maybe if education and trainings for those jobs wasn't so expensive...
Not every person in New Jersey works for big pharma. There are other folks too, Booker should be representing all of them, not just the ones who pay him off.
No, there is nothing for you to logically conclude that from and I do support universal healthcare.
Booker does represent everyone and sometimes that means backing one of the state’s biggest industries
How can you represent the interests of the people, and their needs, while also representing the interests of a corporation when their goals dont align?
Would you ask the same questions about CA senators representing Silicon Valley or agribusiness? Would ypu ask the same of a MI senator defending the auto industry?
Yes
The answer is sometimes you have to make a calculated choice. I believe that most adults who vote and contribute to campaigns are going to understand that NJ=Pharma to a certain extent.
Note I don't like that "and contributes to campaigns" is a factor in politics but this is New Jersey and if Pharma is our #1 industry then corruption has to be #2 or 3.
Money really needs to get out of politics. It's foul how we have to play the game to judge the integrity of decisions.
For the people? Or for the payout?
Obnoxious government
Thank you for your sincere response
You're also assuming he did it for pharma. We don't know.
When he is backing the policies backed by Pharma it is a safe presumption
Representing the people is representing the people.
Representing the interests of the mega corps that is trying to extract labor from that populace while also overcharging for their product is not representing those people that perform the labor and but the product.
This is not complicated
“This is not complicated”
And yet you still manage to be completely incorrect about how the system works IRL. The interests of the people who work at those businesses and those businesses’ interests frequently align.
For example I want it to be easier and cheaper to import booze because I work for an importer and it would be better for me if the business had more cash on hand. People who work for big pharma are not going to be any different.
When you have a career you are invested in you tend to want to keep doing it. You might understand if you find yourself in a similar position.
They sometimes overlap.
They also often conflict.
You're acting like they are always in lockstep
No, Im not but if you aren’t paying attention it might seem that way.