160
submitted 1 year ago by wolf@lemmy.zip to c/technology@beehaw.org

Found on hacker news.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fsniper@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

For now spec calls "holdbacks", which are designed for this purpose. Attestors will fail randomly for a set percentage of the requests so this can't be used as a whitelist. Surely this "holdbacks" will either be not implemented or dropped in no time by attestors.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Surely. Remote attestation is only useful if it always succeeds on an approved device.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
160 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37716 readers
313 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS