866
It aint that hard, fuck wits
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
866 points (100.0% liked)
Funny
9583 readers
1186 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I got my driver's license pretty recently and in driving classes I was always told to look at the left first to see if anyone is inside the roundabout, and then to the right to see if I have to let someone go before me (on small roundabouts). Think it from a logical standpoint: A wouldn't even need to completely stop to let C in first, while, if A goes first, C needs to stop and wait while A passes in front of them.
It may be a new rule, because no one seems to know about it (or pay it any mind).
Really? I thought you never look to the right in a roundabout. You look to the left, and if it's clear, you enter and look forward until you exit. That said, I've never been to a small enough roundabout that there could be a conflict just after entering.
The OP's idea here is that since A is stopped, C has plenty of time to enter the roudabout. That's reasonable if the roudabout is large, and crazy if it's not.
Your idea that C can enter anyway, even if A didn't stop is just crazy.
Why? A and C should be able to enter simultaneously. There's no reason for A to stop.