59
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Well, just to name a few:

  • sack Garland after it became apparent that he was not fit for purpose. Better yet, he shouldn’t have even picked him
  • sack DeJoy (do not give me that bullshit about how “his hands were tied” - that’s demonstrably a matter of interpretation)
  • GOP wants to lean into the maximalist interpretation of executive power? Maliciously comply.
  • pack the court

I can go on, at length, but I’m sure you’re starting to get the point.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

sack Garland after it became apparent that he was not fit for purpose. Better yet, he shouldn’t have even picked him

Garland did the job he was hired to do. He slow walked the investigation so biden could run against trump again.

Better yet, he shouldn’t have even picked him.

Did you skip that part?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

No. He shouldn't have been picked. I just said what the bad reason for picking him was.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Crab is on your side, he thinks Garland was the worst choice for actually stopping Trump. Garland was put on for slowing the court system to allow Biden to defeat Trump twice.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23397 readers
3408 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS