95
submitted 2 weeks ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You’re too polite. This guy is absolutely full of shit. Our awareness of black holes emerged from pure math, as just one example off the dome. Experimental data came later. And decades later, in fact. A lot begins in the math.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's the "make predictions" part, smartass. There is a big difference between calculating the limits with a theory and inventing new limits and trying to find maths that fit.

And even then is the experimental evidence still the most important part. Wormholes, warp drives and white holes are also mathematically possible. Doesn't mean they are real. We didn't call the higgs field real until it was experimentally proven.

Yes, people found a whole lot out via maths. But they didn't just have some idea about how they think nature works and then invented some formulas for that. They built on prior theories and evidence.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
95 points (100.0% liked)

science

18649 readers
642 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS