95
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
95 points (100.0% liked)
science
18635 readers
679 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The more I think about this, the more I'm not sure I 100% agree... For example, special relativity essentially came from the observation that Maxwell's equations were not Galilean invariant, and instead invariant under this weird other group (what we now call the Lorentz group); and QED essentially came from Dirac wanting to take a "square root" of the Klein-Gordan equation.
(Of course, real history is more intricate than this.)
You’re too polite. This guy is absolutely full of shit. Our awareness of black holes emerged from pure math, as just one example off the dome. Experimental data came later. And decades later, in fact. A lot begins in the math.
That's the "make predictions" part, smartass. There is a big difference between calculating the limits with a theory and inventing new limits and trying to find maths that fit.
And even then is the experimental evidence still the most important part. Wormholes, warp drives and white holes are also mathematically possible. Doesn't mean they are real. We didn't call the higgs field real until it was experimentally proven.
Yes, people found a whole lot out via maths. But they didn't just have some idea about how they think nature works and then invented some formulas for that. They built on prior theories and evidence.