434
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
434 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
69726 readers
3328 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah it can happen, when you force people without their consent encrypting their data.
Forcing people is one thing, not telling them its a thing is completely different. Most Windows users dont even know their Windows has bitlocker enabled and those keys are out of their sight
Isn't that what Iphone and Android already do?
One major difference is that it is so much easier to lock yourself out of the desktop TPM chip compared to mobile device security chips because they're not tightly coupled.
and phones make you use your unlock pin often, so people are forced to remember it. on the other hand windows lets you use a short pin instead of your full account password pretty much forever which results in people forgetting the password completely.
That isnt even the part it is encrypted, the TPM encryption is either "Automatic" or over a password (any length) on startup so far i know it from my work with Bitlocker (tpm 2.0) on windows 10. Idk if this is different on windows 11.
Huh .. I never noticed. Probably because my phone OS never failed to boot, requiring me to pull data off the HDD directly.
Samsung is notorious for this.
Most people don't have anything of importance on their phones. And the tuning options are almost absent on phones, so it is less problematic bug-wise.
For many, a mobile device is their sole computer, and things of importance to them are stored on it.
Le banking app.
But THAT is recoverable EASILY, not like lost forever if you dont recover data from that phones storage.
Something like OTP are rather more important.
Well, I wasn't talking about recovery, but need for encryption.
I guess thats true.
No you’re right, nobody has precious photos or videos on their phone 🙄
If they don't save those photos somewhere else from time to time, it means those photos aren't that important.
You're assuming they actually understand proper data protection procedures. You have a very misplaced amount of faith in the knowledge of the average person. Plenty of people just expect stuff to work and are horrified when they realize they're not.
I saw that all the time when I worked in mobile phone sales/support.
I backup my precious dick pics at several offsite locations by sending them to as many people as possible as often as possible.
8-
This is a post about people who don't understand encryption.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
Yeah, nothing important. Just your banking apps, personal documents, photos, government apps, emails, all the services linked to your phone via mobile number, personal chats, work chats, 2fa codes, some other not important stuff. But at least it doesn't have your games. Unless you play games on your phone, then you are fucked.
The only phone manufacture that does that is Google with pixel. Any other phone is for my knowledge either "weakly" encrypted or not at all.
Still your Mobile OS isnt just upgrading and encrypting your SD card and main drive. Thats the point.
https://source.android.com/docs/security/features/encryption/file-based?hl=en
Different threat model and usage scenario. See the spilled milk comment.