632
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
632 points (100.0% liked)
World News
46315 readers
2719 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You'd have a point if she didn't willingly give the pictures up to the shitty male that shared them.
And you would have a point if the man was an openly shitty person. For all you knew this was an otherwise respectable dude who still shared nudes of his partner. You can't always tell shitty dudes ahead of time. Sometimes you can only know them when they are being shitty dudes.
Instead, you don't have a point, you're just looking to blame the victim.
He doesn't even have to be 'openly shitty.' He just has to be 'average' or 'typical' and that should be enough to set off alarm bells because the current dating landscape rewards shitty males while punishing good ones.
It's a cultural problem. I'm not going to give the average male the benefit of the doubt because most average males I've come across in my life fall into the category of 'shitbag womanizer.'
We need to stop enabling them and start educating people on how to make better decisions on who they associate with.
And also start educating the average, shitbag womanizer males to not be that. We could teach them to be normal.
We shouldn't expect bad people to do the right thing because otherwise they wouldn't be bad people. Do you honestly believe this person didn't know what he was doing when he did it? Of course he did, he just didn't care.
I know you like living in a fantasy land, but in the real world there are plenty of horrible people that only see others as stepping stones to get what they want. It's not the world I want to live in, but I would be willfully ignorant if I did not accept it.
You think the woman can change to be more responsible...
but you don't think the man can change to be less irritating.
Pulido, if you don't believe bad people can change, why bother with a society that keeps prisoners at all? Why not just kill them?
I think the male can change if he was forced to. Every time he succeeds in womanizing a victim, he has more reasons to stay the same.
Because I don't accept something as fact just because it's upvoted on reddit. Prisons aren't just for 'rehabilitation.' They are also for keeping ne'er-do-wells away from harming others.
Okay. Let's not let him succeed, then.
Yes, this is why prison is not an unsupervised room in your own house.
I guess it’s also the fault of the victims of abusive relationships then? A man getting abused by his wife or girlfriend should have just not gotten with her?
The point is you can’t know what someone’s like right away, sometimes not for a long while into a relationship.
And again, why are you blaming her and the person sharing the photos?
You either didn't read the article or have a definition of consent that honestly worries me:
But honestly that is somewhat besides the point. Even if she would have made the photos without any outside pressure and full consent that does not give anyone the right to distribute them against her wishes.
If I go to the bank and put my money into my a savings account I am not to blame if they turn around, use it to gamble and lose it all. I never agreed for them to use it in such a fashion even though I agreed for them to use it and it is not something I should have to expect from a bank.
You're right, it doesn't give them the right. Did you think I was implying that it did? You might want to brush up on your reading comprehension if that's the case.